From pascal@rz.hu-berlin.de  Tue Feb  1 16:38:18 2000
Received: from suncom.rz.hu-berlin.de (suncom.rz.hu-berlin.de [141.20.1.31])
	by swi.psy.uva.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA18201
	for <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:38:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost.rz.hu-berlin.de (root@ppp196-135.rz.hu-berlin.de [141.20.196.135])
	by suncom.rz.hu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19103
	for <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:38:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from pascal@localhost)
	by localhost (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id OAA05427;
	Tue, 1 Feb 2000 14:12:39 +0100
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:12:39 +0000 (GMT)
From: Pascal Vaillant <Pascal.Vaillant@rz.hu-berlin.de>
To: Prolog Mailing List <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>
Subject: JPL and SunOS 4.1
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10002011306200.5423-100000@torstrasse>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by swi.psy.uva.nl id QAA18201


Dear _,

Announcing that I managed to use JDK 1.1, JPL 1.0.1 and
SWI-Prolog 3.2.9 together on a Sparc with SunOS 4.1. Thanks
a lot to Jan for the help.

However, I shall warn that the use of SunOS 4.1 is not
recommended by the authoritative specialists, so I will
not advise anybody to do the same (SunOS seems to be harmful
to the health of shared objects, since the one concerned
here [libjpl.so] is twice as big and ten times as slow as
it is on Linux 2.1. Hormons, perhaps?)

Regards,

Pascal

--
Pascal Vaillant                                Jägerstraße 10/11
Humboldt Universität zu Berlin                 10117 Berlin (Allemagne)
Lehstuhl Computerlinguistik                    Tel: (+49/30) 20 19 25 54

