From ino-waiting@gmx.net  Sun May 14 01:39:06 2000
Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131])
	by swi.psy.uva.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA26647
	for <prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl>; Sun, 14 May 2000 01:39:05 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from [62.104.201.2] (helo=mx1.freenet.de)
	by mout0.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #3)
	id 12qlV8-00038u-00
	for prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl; Sun, 14 May 2000 01:39:18 +0200
Received: from [213.6.15.102] (helo=spotteswoode.de)
	by mx1.freenet.de with smtp (Exim 3.14 #3)
	id 12qlV7-0004Zg-00
	for prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl; Sun, 14 May 2000 01:39:18 +0200
Received: (qmail 319 invoked by uid 0); 13 May 2000 23:39:13 -0000
From: "clemensF" <ino-waiting@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 01:39:13 +0200
To: prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl
Subject: Re: Variable implementation
Message-ID: <20000514013913.E230@spotteswoode.de>
Mail-Followup-To: prolog@swi.psy.uva.nl
References: <006201bfbcdc$7216ff40$ba5e36c3@jahve>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <006201bfbcdc$7216ff40$ba5e36c3@jahve>; from jsevaj@corp.phone.com on Sat, May 13, 2000 at 03:09:15PM +0200
Organization: private

> Jon Sevaj (Sat 13.0500-15:09):  I'm currently writing a
> internet or books on this subject. I particularly interested in
> information related to variable implementation, how to distinguish
> bound and unbound variables and how the binding actually is performed.

maybe you should start with memory allocation and garbage collection (no
pun intended intentionally indeed).  important design decisions are based
on this.

-- 
clemens                                              ino-waiting@gmx.net

