[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: The fallacy of DRLs
In article <42ikeq$1b3l@violin.aix.calpoly.edu>, klong@violin.aix.calpoly.edu (Kenneth E. Long) writes:
|> Yes, maybe, just MAYBE you can notice a car on a two-lane country road
|> from a mile away instead of 3/4 of a mile away. SO WHAT? Try driving
|> where I live, in Downtown San Luis Obispo, having a bunch of those dang
|> DRLs coming down crowded, narrow downtown streets. Can't you people
|> understand that the effects of extra, unnecessary light sources on the
|> road are CUMULATIVE?
DRLs are supposed to be reduced-brightness low beams. They should not cause
unnecessary distractions.
|>The sun is all you need!
Sometimes too much. Ever had the sun shining just in front of you?
--
Isaac Wong | Protel Compiler Group
iwong@chat.carleton.ca | Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa
cm644@freenet.carleton.ca | Dept. of Systems and Computer Engineering
TEL: (613) 763-6127 | Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Follow-Ups:
References: