[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: The Federal Study that Finds Speed Limits Irrelevant...
-
Subject: Re: The Federal Study that Finds Speed Limits Irrelevant...
-
From: kimberln@crl.com (J. Kimberlin)
-
Date: 24 Jul 1995 16:30:03 -0700
-
Keywords: federal-study, study, speed-limits, speed, limits
-
Newsgroups: rec.autos.driving, dc.driving, ca.driving
-
Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access (415) 705-6060 [Login: guest]
-
References: <3v0s4l$5kj@clarknet.clark.net>
-
Xref: news.clark.net rec.autos.driving:77499 dc.driving:3326 ca.driving:18399
In article <3v0s4l$5kj@clarknet.clark.net>,
Kevin Atkinson <kevinatk@home.com> wrote:
>Here is part of the federal study that NMA dug up after the goverment
>tried to bury it. The federal government spent over half a million
>dollars and five years on it; it is not just a trivial or academic study.
>
> http://www.clark.net/pub/kevina/sl/
I'm not surprised that the findings on speed show it generally irrevalent.
The question is that if speed doesn't cause accidents, what does?
Actually, an API study on Pay at the Pump Insurance, found that accidents
are caused by traffic density, followed by (I think) driver attitude,
with speed a factor albeit a minor one.
Any more thoughts?
JerryK
Follow-Ups:
References: