[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Solve speeding by limiting cars!



In article <3pu04u$1f2@ludes.com>, Mark Spencer says...
>

>Your vocal chords have legitimate uses.

So does driving fast.

>Slander is not all it is capable of.

The same for fast cars.

>There is no legitimate reason to exceed the
>maximum speed limit,

Ever try passing a car that is doing say 60mph, when you are not able
to exceed 65mph? That's going to end up in a lot of extra dead bodies.
What happens if you need to get to the hospital real fast?
What happens when your livelyhood depends on making as many
deliveries in as short a time as possible?

>and there is no reason that cars should be able to do
>it.

Just because you can't be bothered to think of any, doesn't mean there
aren't any.

>Limiting cars does not infringe on any of your rights

Except for my right to use my property as I see fit, so long as I don't
put anyone else in danger. And please tell me how speeding along
an Arizona highway, with no one else in sight puts others at danger.

>Although you don't condone rape or slander, you seem to condone
>speeding,

Because speeding laws are just one more of the useless, sensless laws,
that the government passes, because it believes it knows better then
we do, how to run our lives.

-- 
Mark.O.Wilson@AtlantaGa.attgis.com
It ain't charity if you ain't using your own money.
Just because a mob calls itself a government, doesn't make it so.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for
dinner.
People who claim that money doesn't matter, are usually living on
someone else's money.
Society is a mental construct, formed by those people who are too
insecure too handle the concept of people as individuals.