You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - Aug 2005

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00260 Aug 2005

 
Aug 2005 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


SrI:

Some instances to show that vaishanvism existed before Ramanuja's 
period.


(1)     In the very early times, that is, soon after creation,
it has been told in scriptures, that Vishnu, after
doing Jatha karma and naama karma to His first ever
uthpaththi(child) Brahma, proceeded to mark the
Shanku-chakra in his shoulders and then applied
oordhwa pundaram that culminated in pancha samskaram.
Brahma is perhaps the FIRST Srivaishnavan of the
universe.This episode also clarifies that
Srivaishnavism does not come as a birth right and as old as creation 
itself.

(2)     When Thirumangai Alwar  wanted to marry Kumuda valli, she said
that she could not marry unless the person had
undergone pancha samskaram and the Alwar rushed to
Thirunaraiyoor (naachiyar koil) and had the
samashrayan done by God Himself. This is  prior to Ramanuja's period. 


(3)     You will find in Thirunagai (nagapattinam ) sannidhi, the 18 
vaarthaigal advised by
Thirukkottiyoor nambigal to Ramanuja written on
the wall.
Vaishnavattwam is said to come at the 10th level
only.
Prior to coming to attain it, the following must be
removed.
1. removal of desire in samsaram
2. this leads to removal of ahankaara, mamakaaram
3. this leads to removal of deha abhimaanam
4. this leads to birth of athma gyanam
5. this leads to hatred towards aeishwarya moham
6. this leads to onset of prema on bhagwan.
7. this leads to shedding of interest in
vishayantharangal
8. this leads to bhara thanthruva gyanam
9. this leads to removal of artha-kaama ragadwesham
(ref: BG 4-10- Madhbhavam)
10. this leads to onset of srivaishanttwam!




(4)     It happened in Kulashekara alwar's life.
When the ministers of the alwar blamed srivaishnavites,for the
disappearance of the navarathna maalai in the
thiruaaparana petti, the alwar refused to believe.
He was steadfast in his belief that srivaishnavites are pure on
tri-kaaran - they are pure in mind, vaak and body.
He even put his hand in a pot that had a serpent
inside  and pledged that he would not be bitten by the
serpent, because no srivaishnavite can do such a crime. And he was 
unhurt. This shows how deep-rooted the ethos which a srivaishnavite 
is identified with. Unless a strong code culture for vaishnavites had 
existed for long, the alwar could not have gone to such extremes.

(5)     A quote on the dialogue between Yama dharma raja and Sri 
Krishna. I think this comes in Mahabharataha.
Yamadjharman instructed his messengers to prostrate before the
srivaishnavites. A srivaishnavite can be identified in the following 
way.
" Ye baahu moola parichinha shanka-chakra:
Yeva lalaada palakelasa oordhwa pundra:
Ye kanda lagna thulasi nalinaaksha mala:
Teh vaishnava: bhuvana maashubha vidhrayanthi" 
The srivaishnavite can be identified by the shanku-chkra chinnam,
oordhwa pundaram and the thulasi maala.

(6)     Sri Krishna was said to have instructed his dwaara-
paalagas, before leaving the fort of Dwaaraka, to
allow sv-s inside, who can be identified by the
shanku-chakra dhaaranam and the oordhwa pundaram.
" chakraangitha: praveshtavyaa:
Yaavadaagamanam mama,
Naamudhritha: praveshtavyaa:
Yaavadaagamanam mama"


Inference:-
Srivaishnavism with the significatory marks and practices had existed 
for very long. But it was Ramanuja who had arranged or codified them 
into  a body of dos and donts for easy following and hence came to be 
identified as founder of srivaishnavism.



Jayasree saranathan.



--- In Oppiliappan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, honganour krishna 
<hokrishna@xxxx> wrote:
> Dear Bhakthas,
> Followers of Vishnu are called as Vishnavas. And a vishnava could 
be a brahmin, Kshtarya, or Vysya. To my knowledge nowhere in 
Ramayana, Mahabharatha, or in Vishnu Purana a single mention of 
Srivishnava is mentioned. These being the great epics and running in 
volumes has no mention of Srivishnava brahmin but one will come 
across mention of mearly vishnava brahmin. Lord Rama and Lord Krishna 
who were Vishnavas never had Srivishnava Namam on their fore-head. If 
Srivishnavism existed in the days of Rama then atleast single mention 
of it would have been made in the Ramayana. We all know Rama had come 
across so many different catagories of people existing at that time 
in his journey from north to extreme south. It is very clear that 
Srivishnavism was not there during Rama and Krishna Days. 
Srivishnavism must have been started some time later. In Hindu 
culture most of the great people are very modest that they do not 
claim there authorship or finding and Srivishnavism is one of them.
>  
> Adiyen Krishna Ramanuja dasan 
>it your home page






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/XUWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Oppiliappan-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list