You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - Feb 2004

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00073 Feb 2004

 
Feb 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear srEvaishNavites,
 
It is true that bhudhAvathArA is not an incarnation. However, as pointed out, it may be a small act by the Lord Himself without being an avathAram in particular.
The following is reference to this in thiru-voi-mozhi
 
"kaLLa vEdathai koNdu pOi puram pukkavArum, kalandhu asurarai bhEdham seidhittu vuyir vuNda upAyangaLum...' 5-10-4.
 
The mention in Edu, irupathi nAlAyirappadi and onbadhAyirappadi -->' bhaudhAvathAra vrudhAntham ennai naliyA ninRadhu engiRAr"
 
It was already mentioned in the earlier messages that;
 
a BuddhAvatharan who came to mislead the asurans with false teachings, this Buddha was not the same Buddha . I think this is right.
dhasan
vanamamalai padmanabhan
 
 


Yahoo! Groups Links


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list