Dear Sri Madhavakannan
svAmy,
This largely differs from the
vyakyanam of Sri PerivyavAchAn PiLLai.
There is no reference to Sri
appuLLAr or SvAmy Desikan in the vyAkyanam.
There is a reference of Sri Periya
Nambi and vudayvar -PeriyaNambi prostrating towards
vudayvar.
2. Since your articles are carried
in groups in English, there is a tendency to take it as original vaykayanam.
Hence, the value of translation is very high for certain groups of
people.
3. You may have sources like Sri
UthaMur svAmy or Sri PBA Svamy or Sri Mathivanan. However, these become
secondary when they do not conform with the original
commentaries.
4. The secondary commentaries -
divyartha dhepikais - are only for assisting to understand the original
vyAkyanam-s and cannot supersede the vyAkyanam-s themselves- in case there is
deviations.
5. I am sure you will understand my
viewpoint. Thanks
adiyan ramanuja
dasan
vanamamalai
padmanabhan
Oppiliappan Koil Varadachari Sadagopan http://www.sadagopan.org
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |