)
Uthamoor swami mentions "Appullar and Desikan may be remembered
here."
__._,_.___
AGreed. 2.---- Kaliyan and Desikan is
not there in Sri Uthamoor swami
vyakyanam
Agreed
That mean there appears to be factual error
or error in coining the words leading to confusion.
It all started with bringing
out Uthamur svamy vaykayanam and now this is the confusion..
So whose anubhavam is this?
Predicting is one thing.
Paying obeseince is another. Thirumangai AzvAr predictring Svamy Desikan is not
in any vyAkyanam-s Neither in Pvp's or Uthamur
svAmy's.
Why should i argue for a thing which was never
there in the UthamUr svAmy's .
3.That is what am saying PVP swami's
vyakyanam on Thirunedunthandakam is the final word FOR YOU and not for EVERYONE.
My opinion is that we are
discussing only for this particular pAsuram and for this PVP vyAkyanam is the
only one, for all sishya paramparai-s.
If there had been any other
vyAkyanam for this , perhpas this question is possible Since for this
TirunedunthANdakam there is no other vyAkyanam, PVP vyAkyanam is final
one.
Let us agree do disagree here
that for us PVP vyAkyanam is the final one for me and it is not so
for a few people like you (not all Svamy Desikan SishyaS as you say)
Uthamur SVAmi's is the final one.
Honestly speaking i
was under the impresion that even for ALL SVAMY DESIKA SISHYAS PVP SVAMY
VYAKYANAM IS THE FINAL ONE, (Unless there is a difference of opinion ) but
now it transpires that it is not so.
HOwever, let all svamy desika sishyas decide
this.
4.
Objections pertaining to philosophy Here there is no
objection to philosophy.
5.) Objections
pertaining to anubhavams Here there is no objection
pertaining to anubhavam-s becasue
UTHAMUR SVAMY HAD NEVER SAID THAT KALIYAN HAD PREDICTED OR PAID
OBESIENCE.
Since there are no
objection for anubhavam-s, the last lines of your mail is not
applicable.
SO THE OBJECTION HERE
IS FACTUAL ERROR. Sri Madhavakannan' svamy message -as you reiterated-
says that he folows UthamUr svAmy's . Now you are syaing that this is not in
UthamUr svAmy's .
So this is a factual
error of translation or coining the words. This needs to be corrected. and
is the source of confusion.
Personal Note: Since i
am leaving for outstaion today, i maynot be able to see eht emails as frequently
as I use to. Further, as i said earlier, you are entitled to your opinion and
for me it is mine. KInldy bear with me, svamin
Thanks ,
ramanuja
dasan
vanamamalai
padmanabhan
Oppiliappan Koil Varadachari Sadagopan http://www.sadagopan.org
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |