|
Dear Devotees,
In Slokam 78 of Sri Vishnu Sahasranamam, Kim is not theonly
nAmA which impresses as unique and which is not commonly used. The other nAmAs
with the same peculiar chracteristics are: Sah, Vah,
Kah, yat, tat.
As pointed out by Shri Krishnamachari in his commentary on this Slokam, "When a word is a pronoun or a sarvanAma,
(andthe words viSvam, ekah etc. are sarvanAma-s when they have their traditional meanings), then it is declined similar to the word sarva, and the dative singular is "sarvasmai, viSvasmai, ekasmai etc." (pANini sUtra 1.1.27). However, when this same words is not treated as a pronoun, and instead refers to something special, like the specific name of a person (e.g., ekah as a person's actual name), then the word is declined like an ordinary noun such as narah, and not as a pronoun. Then the dative singular is declined as sarvAya, viSvAya, ekAya, etc. The example given in explanation of this sUtra by SrISa Candra Vasu in his "AshTAdhyAyI of pANini" is that of the word "sarva" meaning "everything" (a pronoun) vs. sarva being the name of a person (an ordinary noun). The former is declined as a pronoun, and the latter is declined as an ordinary noun like narah. The followers of the advaita sampradAyam seem to consider the different sarvanAma-s that occur in SrI vishNu sahasra nAma as pronouns representing Brahman, whereas the followers of the viSishTAdvaita sampradAyam seem to treat each of the nAma-s as a distinct personification of bhagavAn in His different Forms, and thus each sarvanAma word that occurs as a nAma in sahasra nAmam is treated as a special nAma of bhagavAn with its own special meaning, each a proper noun in its own right, and not treated as a pronoun standing for Brahman. " I am reproducing below Shri Krishnamachari's Posting onthe
nAmA Kim only; interested members may read his excellent explanations for the
other nAmAs, such as Sah, Vah, Kah, Yat & Tat at http://home.attbi.com/~chinnamma/sahasra/sloka78.htm :
"735. kim ?
a) He about Whom all questions are asked by seekers of
Truth b) He Whose praise is sung by His devotees c) He Who is fit to be enquired about or sought after. Om kime namah The common usage of the word kim is to represent the question ?What??. The word kim is derived from the root praccha ? j~nIpsAyAm ? to ask, to seek. Here it is used as a noun, and means ?He about Whom all questions are asked by seekers of Truth?. SrI sataydevo vAsishTha comments: pRcchati iti kim | pRcchyata iti vA kim |? ? He who asks is kim, or He about whom questions are asked is also kim. Here bhagavAn is called kim in the context of the latterof the two. In other words, all questions that are asked by those who want to realize Him, are questions about Him, since they all lead to Him in the end. SrI vAsishTha gives an alternate derivation as well, starting from the root kai ? Sabde ? to sound, leading to ?kAyati iti kim? ? He about Whom questions are asked, such as ?Who is He, What is He, Where is He?,etc., is kim. Those who seek Him start with the enquiry of ?What?, and end up with Him after they realize that He is the ultimate answer to every enquiry. SrI BhaTTar?s vyAkhyAnam is: SrI v.v. rAmAnujan gives reference to tiruvAimozhi 5.6.2, where nammAzhvAr declares about perumAL: ?kaRkum kalvic cAramum yAnE?. In fact, every line of each pASuram, starting with 5.6.1 (kaDal j~nAlam SeidEnum yAnE ennum?), all the way up to 5.6.10 (kOlam koL Suvarkkamum yAnE ennum ??.), are beautiful singing of His being everything, line after line. SrI Samkara?s interpretation is: kim tad brahma kim adhyAtmam kim karma purushottama | ?What is that Brahman? What is adhyAtma? What is karma? What is said to be
adhibhUta? SrI satyadevo vAsishTha gives similar passages from the Rg veda, which ask similar rhetorical questions about Brahman: - ambhah kim AsIt gahanam gabhIram (10-129-1) ? kutah AjAtA kuta iyam visRshTih (10-129-6) ? yo?syAdhyakshah parame vyoman (10-129-7) ? Thus, He is called ?kim- What? because He is the Ultimate answer to all the questions. b) SrI kRshNa datta bhAradvAj uses the root ku~ng ? Sabde ? to sound,
and the uNAdi sutra kAyater dimih (siddhAnta kaumudi, uNAdi sutra
600) to derive the word kim, and gives the definition
? c) SrI aNNa?ngarAcArya gives the interpretation that this nAma means that He
is One who is worth being sought after; One Who is described as
anveshTavyah in the Upanishads: The dharma cakram writer elaborates that bhagavAn is called kim ? He Whose Nature is contemplated on by those who seek the Truth, because it is by knowing this Truth that everything there is to be known is known. That which is beyond time, space, etc., that which never changes and is eternal, that which is beyond the reach of the senses and is only reached by true devotion and meditation, that which is in everything and everywhere, is the Ultimate answer to all questions asked by those who seek the Truth." I thank Shri Krishnamachari for his extensive research that has produced notes such as this for the remaining nAmAs also, namely, Sah, Vah, Kah, Yat & Tat to enlighten us on these Special nAmAs for Sri Vishnu about whicheven Sanskrit Pandits seem to be confused. Dasan,
|
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |