Shall be OBLIGED If all the 39 or 48 avataram of the LORD can be stated for benefit of all of us
We all know of major 10 and a few more like Kapila Dhanvantri Hayagriva Annam etc
Thanks adiyen dasanOn Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Dr. Sadagopan <yennappan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:SrI:
Dear Members : For Your Information .
V.Sadagopan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ram Anbil" <Ramanbil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <shalu_holy@xxxxxxxxx>; <andavan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<lordsrinivasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <srirangasri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [SriRangaSri] doubt on bhudha avataram
>
> Dear Swamin:It is said "avataaraa: asankhyEya:" meaning that the Avataras
> taken by the lord are countless.
> Over 48 Avataras have been identified of which 10 are considered to be
> major ones (Dasa Avataras) while others are considered auxiliary avataras.
>
> Paancharaatra Samhita lists 39 avtaras.
> Swami Desikan mentions "thirty and odd" in "Tattva Traya Chintana
> Adhikaara" of his "Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram"
> Most of these avtaras have been described in Paancha Raatra Samhita.
>
> The Puranic Buddha in question is called "Aadhi Buddha" and is found
> described in Matsya PuraaNa (47.247), Bhaaagavta PuraaNa (1.3.24),
> Bhavishya PuraaNa ( 3.1.6) and Agni PuraaNa (6). You may have to go
> through the stories in the respective PuraaNas and the Paancha Raatra
> Samhita, if you need greater details about this Pre-historic "Aadhi
> Buddha"
>
> Thus, he is totally different from the Post-Puranic, "historical" Buddha
> known as "Siddhaartha" and "Gautama Buddha"
>
> Hope this clarifies.
> Dasoham
> Anbil Ramaswamy
>
>
> To: andavan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lordsrinivasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> srirangasri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: shalu_holy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: Wed, 28 May
> 2008 05:27:16 -0700Subject: [SriRangaSri] doubt on bhudha avataram
>
>
>
>
>
> srimathe ramanujaya namaha
>
> namo narayana
>
> ananthakoti dhandangal to all bagavathas .In
> srivaishnanavm.org i saw some writings about budha avataram
>
> In that its been told the budha avataram is not
> goutama budha tht people are following now .its some other budha
> .Bagavatham and many scriptures talk abt budha avataram..
>
> My doubt is If it is not this goutama budha who is
> tht budha ?I just dont want the name as mentioned in website .
>
> .If we are capable of telling he is not the one we
> should also be able to tell who is that?? when he lived ??why he is
> considered as lord avataram ..what leela's he did ?any pramanams for
> telling he is not goutama budha..and also pramanams for the budha
> mentioned .
>
> If we are not able to tell which budha he is ,when
> he lived ?,wat he did ?,or any pramanams? ,we should not tell it is not
> goutama budha with full confidence .
>
> I am not challenging anything here ..its my long time
> doubt which is disturbing me .
>
>
> adiyen
> srisaila ramanuja dasan
__._,_.___
Oppiliappan Koil Varadachari Sadagopan
http://www.sadagopan.org
![]()
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list