i AM Sorry to see mudslinging on Rajaji is implied here. He was the
tallest Iyengar i have seen in perosn who practiced true Ramanuja
philosophy which implied we shed our hatred of other castes. I was
brought up in a village in Tanjore in early 50s and have seen the
almost apartheid type habits we had. Rajaji fought this openly. even
today if only we have integrated other castes sooner we would not
have seen other religions chipping away Hinduisum. Rajaji showed the
way, was an ardent Bhaktha and wrote so well to impress the younger
generation. even today his Ramayana and Mahabharatha command
attention in the book shelf.
The rise of Dravida Kazhagam was brought by the self serving congress
who neglected Tamil and its rich culture . How can we ever think of
not praying with Azhwar pasurams when it was for us to understand so
easily? DMK was split by MGR who belived in God and openly prayed and
that was also a victory for good forces and some credit for that
should go to Rajaji. WE should never fight dravida vedam and the
enormous contributiosn in Tamil by azhwars Nayanmars, Thrumoolar,
Tahaayumanavar.
That Mu Ka is winning often is becasue so many of us have deserted TN
amd moved for jobs in other fields professions and work for
foreginers.
Uneless we eschew hatred and not denigrate an Azhwar type man like
Rajaji only MU Ka will succeed
Therrazhandur Parthasarathy Sampath
--- In Oppiliappan@yahoogroups. , srinivasan sowmianarayanancom
<vasans2004@...> wrote:
>
> I went through the article. But the only question that comes up to
my mind is: Who was responsible for bringing up this DMK into
prominence? Without "him" would they have come up to the front on the
political arena? I am ashamed of ourselves. The culprit was a
traitor, but even now he is being held in high esteem by the so
called Brahmins. Why the author of this article has omitted that
point? I am really sorry that the facts have not been fully brought
up by the author. By the omission of the very shameful event of the
history, the article deserves to be thrown into the dust-bin.
> Srinivasan
>
> "Dr. Sadagopan" <yennappan@...> wrote:
> Dear Sri Thiruvenaktaswamy :
>
> Thank you for sharing this
> well researched article .
> V.Sadagopan
> ----- Original Message ----- From: ramanujam thiruvenkataswamy
> To: yennappan@...
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 11:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [Thatha_Patty] One nice analysis - good to read and
understand
>
>
>
> Respected Dr.Sadagopan,
> Excellent article.If you deem it fit,the same can be released to
our groups.
> With my best respects,
> Adiyen
> T.Ramanujam
>
> Raman K <kraman44@...> wrote:
>
> KARUNANIDHI â?" Persona of Hindu Hatred!
> 9/19/2007 9:35:53 AM B.R.HARAN
>
>
> KARUNANIDHI â?" PERSONA OF HINDU HATRED!
>
> The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Karunanidhi can be personified as a
product of a combination of all evils such as Atheism, Dravidianism,
Selfishness, Hypocrisy, and Hindu-hatred.
>
> The so-called Aryan-Dravidian theory was used by the British to
create a north-south divide and the same was utilized to the hilt by
E.V.Ramaswamy, who founded the Dravidar Kazhagam to come in to the
limelight based on anti-Brahminism. Annadurai, Karunanidhi,
Nedunchezhian, EVK Sampath and a few others joined EVR and together
they worked tirelessly with a sole aim of separating Tamils from the
Hindu fold on the plank that, only Aryans are Hindus and Dravidians
(Tamils) are a separate race being oppressed by the Aryans for more
than three thousand years. Initially, they also had the support of
Justice Party, which was a stooge of the British, and EVR even went
to the extent of observing our independence day, August 15, as
a "Black Day". Later on, due to personal feud, Annadurai came out of
DK along with Karunanidhi, Nedunchezhian & others to float the
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) as an offshoot of DK. In the
inaugural function they had kept one empty chair on the head
> of the dais for EVR, saying that he was their permanent leader.
Both DK and DMK ably aided & supported by Marxist & Dravidian
historians have spoilt three to four generations of Tamils since the
fifties.
>
> Now, DMK President Karunanidhi and DK president Veeramani are
continuing the evil legacy of EVR for the detriment of Tamil Nadu &
Tamils. Through out his political career, Karunanidhi has survived by
adopting the 'divide & rule' policy conceived by the British through
the distortion of our great history and civilization purely for his
selfish interests. In the process, he has never missed out even a
single opportunity to make disparaging remarks on Hindus, Hindu Gods,
Hindu philosophy and Hindu culture apart from denigrating Sanskrit &
Hindi, and simultaneously, he had appeased & appreciated the
interests of minorities (read Muslims & Christians), so that, he can
be at the helm of affairs permanently. While making such remarks, he
never felt shy or shame on exhibiting his lack of knowledge in
History, Religion & Culture.
>
> When the Hindus protested against the installation of EVR's
statue in front of the famous Srirangam Temple, He asked, "When
Temple Towers have nude sculptures and when nude Gods & Goddesses are
kept inside the Temples, what is wrong in having a well dressed EVR
in front of the Temple?" This one statement is enough to prove his
prejudice, perversion and Hindu-hatred. As a Chief Minister, he
always conveys his official greetings to Muslims & Christians on
Ramzaan, Christmas, Milad-un-Nabhi, Bakrid, Good Friday, etc, but he
never greets the Hindus on any of their festivals. He greets the
people only on the day of 'Pongal' (celebrated as Shankranthi in
other parts of the country), saying that Pongal is a Tamil cultural
festival, only with a bad intention of separating the Tamils from the
Hindu fold . Incidentally, this 'rationalist' follows a 'divine
culture' of wearing a 'Yellow Shawl' (the colour of Lord
Dakshinamoorthy) for which he has given hundred and one rationalist
> explanations and not even one was convincing.
>
> A few days back, just before Ganesh Chathurthi festival he had
said, "Lord Ganesha was born in 'Vathapi' (Karnataka) and was brought
to Tamil Nadu from there during Pallava period and hence he is not a
Tamil God". He knows pretty well that Lord Shiva (Father of Ganesha)
and Lord Muruga (revered as Tamil god & brother of Ganesha) and
Mother Parvathi are all worshipped by Tamils from ancient times, but
then, he always has a sadistic pleasure of demeaning only the Hindu
Gods for the sake of electoral gains. Being well informed on Tamil
Literature, he must be aware of the fact that, Lord Ganesha was
extensively mentioned in Sangam Literature and that even the Shivite
trio of 'Sambandar', 'Appar' and 'Sundarar' have worshipped Lord
Ganesha through their hymns. He must also be aware of the
masterpiece "Vinayagar Agaval" sung by the ancient poet 'Avvaiyar',
but he deliberately makes such humiliating remarks to satisfy his ego
and gets sadistic pleasure out of it. Ironically,
> he shamelessly launched his TV Channel (Kalaignar TV) on the
auspicious day of "Ganesh Chathurthi". Incidentally due to 'selective
amnesia', the CM has conveniently forgotten the fact that, EVR was a
Kannadiga hailing from Karnataka and that he himself hails from
Andhra, as his mother tongue is Telugu.
>
> Again a few days back, he refused to send his greetings to the
foundation ceremony for the "Baratha Muni Temple", being built by
Baratha Natyam artist & exponent Padma Subramniam. His contention was
that, only 'Ilango Adigal', who wrote 'Silappathikaram' expounded the
nuances of Baratha Natyam and not 'Baratha Muni'. He went on to say
that, building a memorial for Baratha Muni is a revival of Aryan
oppression of Dravidians. No doubt, it is true that Ilango Adigal
has extensively written in his Silappathikaram about the nuances of
Art and even the measurements of the Arangam (Auditorium)
meticulously. But, it is also true that the art of Baratha Natyam is
divine, founded by Bharatha Muni, much before the times of Ilango
Adigal and Ilango Adigal has not invented or discovered the art, but
only explained the facts, which were already there in practice. But,
the alleged actual reason for Karunanidhi's refusal to send greetings
is that, Padma Subramaniam has laid the
> foundation on a piece of land (5 Acres) donated by the government
of Tamil Nadu, when Jayalalitha was the CM and that Padma is a good
friend of Jayalalitha and that both of them are Brahmins.
>
> Sometimes, he over acts and entertains us with his rationalist
wisecracks. A few days back, he amused us with his finding of a
meaning, Sanskrit meaning, for the word "Kalaignar". He said
that, "Kalaignar" means "Shastri" and cited the name of the famous
poet & writer Surya Narayana Shastri, who changed his name as Parithi
Mar Kalaignar in his later part of life. "Parithi" in Sanskrit
means "Surya" (Sun) in Tamil and "Maal" means "Narayanan" (Lord
Vishnu) and "Shastri" means "Kalaignar". 'Kalaignar' can also be
interpreted as 'entertainer'!
>
> Last & latest but not the least, In the wake of central
government's bungling in the affidavit submitted by the ASI to the
Supreme Court and consequently withdrawing it after a nation wide
protest from Hindu majority, a disappointed Karunanidhi felt let down
by the center and hence fired his anti-Hindu salvos at the annual
anti-Hindu congregation called the "Mupperum Vizha" (a celebration of
birth anniversaries of EVR, Annadurai & DMK party). He had said that
there was nothing wrong in the affidavit, which mentioned that Lord
Rama, Ramayana & Rama Sethu were mere myth and there is no historical
proof for their existence. He had also cited the observation of
Jawaharlal Nehru in his 'Discovery of India' as evidence, as if Nehru
was the voice of India. It is a well-known fact that Nehru himself
was an anti-Hindu, as evidenced by his famous statement, "I am a
Hindu by the accident of birth". Karunanidhi also went on to
say, "Some say there was a person over 17 lakh years ago.
> His name was Ramar. Do not touch the bridge constructed by him,
they are saying. But then, from which engineering college had he
graduated? Is there any proof for this?" This kind of a statement
ridiculing Lord Rama, who is the most revered God of the country and
Hindus living world over, is unwarranted and uncalled for, that too
from the Chief Minister in his official capacity as the state head,
and needs to be condemned in the strongest of terms. After all, he
got to his office only by the votes of majority, who have faith in
God. To make matters worse, the leader of the "Black Rats",
K.Veeramani, who has said that he would organize statewide agitations
in support of the withdrawn affidavits, also supports him. The
mistake of "Raja" (King or the government head) will only lead to the
sufferings of his "Prajaas" (innocent people), as evidenced by the
death of the innocent persons in the burnt down bus near Bangalore.
> In the same function, touching his pet Aryan-Dravidian theory,
he said, "Rama is an Aryan God and Ravana is a Dravidian and the
communal (read Hindu) organizations working against Sethusamudhram
project are Aryans trying to stall the development of Dravidian Tamil
Nadu". A look at the true history would teach us that, Lord Ganesha,
Lord Muruga, Lord Rama, Sage Agasthya & Bharatha Muni are among the
many Gods & Sages, who were responsible for the evolving &
flourishing of the Vedic Civilisation & Culture including the so-
called Tamil culture. The history also says that, 'Pulasthiya
Maharishi' was the grand father of Ravana and 'Vishravavasu' was the
father of Ravana and they hail from the clan of 'Kasyapa Maharishi'.
Hence, Ravana was a Brahmin and a great Shiva Baktha. He was also an
exponent of 'Saama Vedha' and a great musician, an expert with Veena.
On the other hand, Lord Rama was a Kshathriya belonging to "Ikshvagu
Vamsaa" or "Raghu Vamsaa".
> Karunanidhi's statements have invited strong reactions within
Tamil Nadu and the first reaction apart from the state Hindu outfits
was from the strong 'Vanniyar Sangam'. The Vanniyars belong to the
Kshathriya Varna and since Lord Rama was a Kshathriya, the sangam
felt offended and had come out with a severe warning to the CM
demanding an unconditional apology, while also criticizing his
ordinance on 7% reservations for minorities ( 3.5 % each for Muslims
& Christians) from within the 30% quota of the MBCs, as their quota
has been reduced to 23%. Actor Sarath Kumar, who plunged in to
politics recently and claims of representing the Nadar Community, has
also condemned the Chief minister for hurting the Hindu sentiments.
Now, the Tamil Nadu Congress, which is already losing its presence in
the state, is terribly worried at the impending loss of heavy Hindu
vote percentage because of Karunanidhi's insensitive diatribes
against Hindus.
> The "Hindu history" is the history of India, or rather, the
history of Baratha Varsha, which has been clearly documented with
unquestionable evidences.
> Karunanidhi was a born anti-Hindu and he had developed his
political career on anti-Hinduism and it is too late on his part to
change his mentality & mend his ways and it is also too naïve on our
part to expect him to change. It is only the people of Tamil Nadu,
who have to change, by rejecting the Dravidian parties and their
leaders, for their own benefits and for the betterment of Tamil Nadu.
> I remember, as a young school boy, during the discussions between
the elders of our family, they used to say, "The 'sins' committed by
the Hindus have taken the forms of EVR, Karunanidhi, Veeramani and
the likes and that is why we are suffering at the hands of these
Dravidian leaders for the sins committed by us". Now, after having
grown up by seeing the politics of hatred, cowardice, cunningness,
crime, corruption, selective rationalism and stinking pseudo-
secularism, I totally agree with the elders of my family.
>
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ---
> Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo!
Travel.
>
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ---
> Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not
web links.
>
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |