You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Apr 2004

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00034 Apr 2004

 
Apr 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Bhagavataas,

Added to this I would also quote a verse from Kulashekaralvar's Mukunda mala:

"prANa prayANa samayE kapha vAta pittaihi
kanThavarodhana Vidhou smaranam kutaste"

Regards
Mohan.R


On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 vimalkumar ranganathan wrote :
>WIth atmost respect, how are these discussions anyway related to Ramanuja's or 
>Manavala Mamuni's message?? I guess this forum is to encourage each other on 
>Bagavathvishayam, prapatti to Lord Sriman Narayana and glorifying the leelas 
>of the Lord and his devotees.
>
>Adi ShankarA's words spring to my mind:
>
>"samprApte sannihite kAle
>nahi nahi rakShati dukrunjkaraNe"
>
>Nothing personal.
>
>Dasan,
>
>Kidambi Soundararajan.
>
>AzhwAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE Saranam.
>
>
>
>amshuman_k <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote:
>Dear Sri mahavishNu sharman:
>
>Namaste. There was a deviation from the main thread from yajur-vedic
>legends to sanskrit grammatical syntax. Rest assured that I have no
>intentions to re-write samskrta vyAkaraNam and I very well know the
>differences between tenuis, tenuis aspirata, media, media aspirata
>and nasalis forms of labial phonemes, despite the large gap (more
>than a decade) between now and my formal sanskrit education.
>
>Having said this, "trishtuB" (or its variants trStuB, triStubh etc.)
>are what I encountered in my madhyandina as well as kaNva shatapatha
>brAhmaNa texts. Moreover, this is the term that I consistently saw in
>Max Mueller's translation of upanishads & portions of Rg mandalas,
>Buhler's translation of dharma sUtras, A.B. Keith's translation of
>black-yajus samhita and various European indoligists' books &
>articles. I am willing to agree that I am wrong along with all the
>European indologists.
>
>I also forwarded my doubt to my acquaintance who is a trivedi, vedic
>scholar and sanskrit scholar (recently participated in a sOma yAga in
>Maharashtra). I am reproducing portion of his reply. Inferences can
>be drawn at one's conveniences.
>
>"...Correct nominative singular form that you will find in any
>dictionary or vedic text is triShTubh. You may find the form triSTup
>only in sandhi as triSTupchandas- this is the form in the vedic
>anukramaNikas.
>You may encounter a variant sandhi in AV chandas tarpaNaM mantra eg:
>triShTubgAyatryuShNikanuShtubjagati ...
>
>So your guy is wrong..."
>
>Best wishes & regards,
>KK
>
>
>
>
>
>
>azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list