Shriman Vimal, The home page of our group starts with "... the way of life as taught by vedic rishis and Azhwars...", which IMHO is broader than Ramanuja's and mAmuni's messages. I apologize for the deviation and excursions into samskrita-vyAkaraNa. If our moderator wishes, I will desist from making posts on vedic literature. Thanks & regards, KK --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vimalkumar ranganathan <panardasan@xxxx> wrote: > WIth atmost respect, how are these discussions anyway related to Ramanuja's or Manavala Mamuni's message?? I guess this forum is to encourage each other on Bagavathvishayam, prapatti to Lord Sriman Narayana and glorifying the leelas of the Lord and his devotees. > > Adi ShankarA's words spring to my mind: > > "samprApte sannihite kAle > nahi nahi rakShati dukrunjkaraNe" > > Nothing personal. > > Dasan, > > Kidambi Soundararajan. > > AzhwAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE Saranam. > > > > amshuman_k <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote: > Dear Sri mahavishNu sharman: > > Namaste. There was a deviation from the main thread from yajur- vedic > legends to sanskrit grammatical syntax. Rest assured that I have no > intentions to re-write samskrta vyAkaraNam and I very well know the > differences between tenuis, tenuis aspirata, media, media aspirata > and nasalis forms of labial phonemes, despite the large gap (more > than a decade) between now and my formal sanskrit education. > > Having said this, "trishtuB" (or its variants trStuB, triStubh etc.) > are what I encountered in my madhyandina as well as kaNva shatapatha > brAhmaNa texts. Moreover, this is the term that I consistently saw in > Max Mueller's translation of upanishads & portions of Rg mandalas, > Buhler's translation of dharma sUtras, A.B. Keith's translation of > black-yajus samhita and various European indoligists' books & > articles. I am willing to agree that I am wrong along with all the > European indologists. > > I also forwarded my doubt to my acquaintance who is a trivedi, vedic > scholar and sanskrit scholar (recently participated in a sOma yAga in > Maharashtra). I am reproducing portion of his reply. Inferences can > be drawn at one's conveniences. > > "...Correct nominative singular form that you will find in any > dictionary or vedic text is triShTubh. You may find the form triSTup > only in sandhi as triSTupchandas- this is the form in the vedic > anukramaNikas. > You may encounter a variant sandhi in AV chandas tarpaNaM mantra eg: > triShTubgAyatryuShNikanuShtubjagati ... > > So your guy is wrong..." > > Best wishes & regards, > KK > > > > > > > azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam > > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Groups Links > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |