You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Apr 2004

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00039 Apr 2004

 
Apr 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Shriman Vimal,
The home page of our group starts with "... the way of life as taught 
by vedic rishis and Azhwars...", which IMHO is broader than 
Ramanuja's and mAmuni's messages. I apologize for the deviation and 
excursions into samskrita-vyAkaraNa.
If our moderator wishes, I will desist from making posts on vedic 
literature.

Thanks & regards,
KK

--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vimalkumar ranganathan 
<panardasan@xxxx> wrote:
> WIth atmost respect, how are these discussions anyway related to 
Ramanuja's or Manavala Mamuni's message?? I guess this forum is to 
encourage each other on Bagavathvishayam, prapatti to Lord Sriman 
Narayana and glorifying the leelas of the Lord and his devotees.
> 
> Adi ShankarA's words spring to my mind:
> 
> "samprApte sannihite kAle
> nahi nahi rakShati dukrunjkaraNe"
> 
> Nothing personal.
> 
> Dasan,
> 
> Kidambi Soundararajan.
> 
> AzhwAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE Saranam.
> 
> 
> 
> amshuman_k <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote:
> Dear Sri mahavishNu sharman:
> 
> Namaste. There was a deviation from the main thread from yajur-
vedic 
> legends to sanskrit grammatical syntax. Rest assured that I have no 
> intentions to re-write samskrta vyAkaraNam and I very well know the 
> differences between tenuis, tenuis aspirata, media, media aspirata 
> and nasalis forms of labial phonemes, despite the large gap (more 
> than a decade) between now and my formal sanskrit education.
> 
> Having said this, "trishtuB" (or its variants trStuB, triStubh 
etc.) 
> are what I encountered in my madhyandina as well as kaNva 
shatapatha 
> brAhmaNa texts. Moreover, this is the term that I consistently saw 
in 
> Max Mueller's translation of upanishads & portions of Rg mandalas, 
> Buhler's translation of dharma sUtras, A.B. Keith's translation of 
> black-yajus samhita and various European indoligists' books & 
> articles. I am willing to agree that I am wrong along with all the 
> European indologists.
> 
> I also forwarded my doubt to my acquaintance who is a trivedi, 
vedic 
> scholar and sanskrit scholar (recently participated in a sOma yAga 
in 
> Maharashtra). I am reproducing portion of his reply. Inferences can 
> be drawn at one's conveniences.
> 
> "...Correct nominative singular form that you will find in any 
> dictionary or vedic text is triShTubh. You may find the form 
triSTup 
> only in sandhi as triSTupchandas- this is the form in the vedic 
> anukramaNikas.
> You may encounter a variant sandhi in AV chandas tarpaNaM mantra eg:
> triShTubgAyatryuShNikanuShtubjagati ...
> 
> So your guy is wrong..."
> 
> Best wishes & regards,
> KK
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service. 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list