You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Jan 2003

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00115 Jan 2003

 
Jan 2003 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


srImathE ramAnujAya namah

dear bhAgavathAs,

some of the discussions recently on the list raise an issue
regarding whether rAmAnuja talks about archa worship in srIbhAshya.
This raises an intersting question. If rAmAnuja did not explictly
support the archa form of worship in srIbhAsya, how did it become
so prevalent, and how did he succeed in convincing others that
it is valid? The answer lies in srIbhAsya itself. It turns out
that rAmAnuja did talk about pAncarAtra, and defends pAncarAtra
as faultless in srIbhAshya.

The adhikaraNa is known as "utpatti asambhava adhikaraNa". It is
the eighth adhikaraNa in the second part of the second chapter.
The following is a brief summary of what is present in that
adhikaraNa {based on the translation of srIbhAshya by srI.
M B VaradarAja Aiyangar}.

The adhikaraNa first presents the pUrvapaksha opinion that the
pAncarAtra system of worship is not in accordance with the 
vEdAs for the following reason. It teaches that 
" the jIva known as SamkarshaNa is born out
of vAsudEva, who is the Supreme Cause and is the Supreme Brahman:
out of SamkarshaNa is born the manas called pradhyumna: out of
which the principle of egoity known as anirudhdha is born".

The argument of the pUrvapakshins is that here,in contradiction
to the vEda, it is seen that the jIva has birth. The vEda speaks
of the beginninglessness of the jIva in many passages.

Also, out of the agent (i.e. the jIva), the instrument (namely,
the manas/mind) cannot be produced. The teaching in pAncarAtra
that "Out of SamkarshaNa is born the mind called pradhyumna"
is contrary to the teaching in vEdAs "From Him is born the
prANa, the mind and all the sensory organs" [Mund. Up].

Since this system deals with things opposed to the vEda,
the authoratitiveness of the system is also negatived.

rAmAnuja argues in the sidhdhAntha portion of this 
adhikaraNa that the system is indeed valid. His main thesis
is that SamkarshaNa and others all all of the same nature as
what is intelligent and the source (i.e. Brahman). If they all
have the same characteristics as the Brahman, then the system
which is devoted to teaching about them cannot be denied
authoritativeness. He also quotes several passages from
pAncarAtra where the "birth" of a jIva is negated. 
In a long argument, rAmAnuja brings up several arguments
as to why it should not interpreted as those opposed to it
do, and how it is indeed authentic, strongly concluding that
the pAncarAtra system of worship is in accordance with the
vEdAs and faultless.

--

It is clear that srI rAmAnuja clearly defends the pAncarAtra
system of worship (as opposed to srI sankara and srI vallabha)
as free from *any* defect. {Sri Sankara and srI vallabha
appear to accept the pAncarAtra except in regard to the 
doctrine of origination of the individual self}.

Since rAmAnuja accepts and defends pAncarAtra as "faultless"
in this adhikaraNa, it is clear that the he also defends
the archa form of the Lord as propounded in the pAncarAtra.
In fact, there is a quote from the paushkAra samhita that
he uses - "Wherever indeed the fourfold Self is, as a matter
of duty, worshipped by the BrahmaNas, under His names in the
proper order, as an object of devotion, that is the Agama",
which can be taken as alluding to the archa form of worship.

adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan,
varadhan




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list