Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha > Just to make a layman's life easy(not to think that Lord is > partial),you don't introduce sahetukam or make it "sound like" > sahetukam in pUrvAcAryAs works! Do you understand Lord better than > NammAzhvAr? I humbly request you to first read my post in entirty and then make such accusations:) I did not introduce nor did I make it sound like sahetukam. From jeevatma's perspective it is Nirhetukam "ONLY". I have mentioned this many times. I apologize for I can't explain this any better. I request again, to read the post in its entirty and try to understand it before making such statements. Yatheendra Pravanam Vandhe RAMYA Jamataram Munim Adiyen RAmanuja Dasan, Lakshmi Narasimhan --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "nappinnai_nc" <nappinnai_nc@xxxx> wrote: > Sri: > Srimathe Ramanujaya nama: > > > Please note the point->"it did nothing to qualify for the moksham". > > This includes the self realization act too. But, please remember, > > if we say "knowledge of swaroopam / opening of the mind is too due > > to the lord's Nirhetuka krupai" to those with a layman perspective, > > then we put our Purvacharyas into trouble, because, here our > > statement would be perceived as if the Lord is partial i.e he > > opens up the mind only for those whom he likes. So, we should be > > careful in defining the Nirhetuka krupai. > > Whether or not layman catches the point,it's left to God's grace. > Just because a layman doesn't catch the point,it doesn't put our > pUrvAcAryAs into trouble! Whether or not I like Sun rising in the > east,it is not going to change its course of direction! If somebody > thinks that Lord is partial,let him think so with full freedom. When > the time comes he will realize that Lord is not partial. Whichever > direction one goes,one will only see the board "nirhetuka krpa". > BTW,do you think that by your definition of nirhetuka krpa in > English,a layman will get a crystal clear picture of the topic and > also pUrvAcAryAs will be intact? It is Lord's(or AcAryAs) headache to > correct the jIvAtmAs that are straying away from Him. BTW,nirhetuka > krpa is the top and prime doctrinal difference between the two sects. > Just to make a layman's life easy(not to think that Lord is > partial),you don't introduce sahetukam or make it "sound like" > sahetukam in pUrvAcAryAs works! Do you understand Lord better than > NammAzhvAr? NammAzhvAr says he has not done anything and one has to > accept it as a fact if divya prabandham is drAvida vedam/shruthi! You > write from perspective of the Lord as if you know the Lord''s mind > very well. > > PS:In the preface of SVB book that I have,Sri TA Sampathkumaracarya > says if someone(layman/neophyte) feels that some of these teachings > can not be appreciated or practised,let him understand that he has > not reached the "necessary state of moral development". I totally > believe in this. > > AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE sharaNam > NC Nappinnai
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |