Dear Shri Sampath Swamin, Kindly read the recent post that Shri Rama Swamy has posted. The purpose of my post was to take every post with the right intent, if not we should at least get the clarification from the writer. If we say that the writer is saying something false and not the facts, then a) we are criticizing the writer without clarification(this is in fact Bhagavathapacharam) b) we are criticizing the moderator too for allowing a post that contains no facts. Please don't take my post wrong. Please take it in the right spirit. My apologies in case I had offended anyone. I humbly request you to kindly check your statements - "No way we should feel proud to say that Swami sannidhi is not being taken care." - Why would you conclude that? No one is proud to say that swami sannidhi is not being take care. Everyone is definitely feeling bad(every Shri Vaishnava will feel bad and hence I think I can generalize). "It looks nothing but funny. " - Requesting again to read through Shri Rama Swami's post again and then make such comments. Note: I still agree that I don't know the internal details. I only said "I think" what Shri Rama swamy says is true, due to the very reason that I know swamy and, knowing his Shri Vaishnava Lakshnam alone is enough to say so. Everyone will get to know about him when the right time comes. So, I don't think there is any contradiction in my post. Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan, Lakshmi Narasimhan --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sampath kumar <pbsampathkumar@xxxx> wrote: > > > Dear Swamin, > > I really feel sorry to write this mail, but circumstances have made to > > write down. I sincerely apologise if this mail hurts any body, because my > > intention is not hurt the bagavathas of this egroup but only to clarify certain > > issues. > > > At the outset, i find your statements are contradicting to each other. Earlier > > you say you dont know internals of the temple and later you say whatever Shri Rama swami says is true. Can you just let me know how you were able to conclude that something is happening inside the temple. > > Please let me know what is the necessity for posting it in this group instead of > > contacting the appropriate authorities and ensure the temple operations are straightened. What is the authenticity for this information Sri Rama swami has? It looks nothing but funny. > > What do we gain by saying that Sriperumbudur is in a state of neglect, when it is not so. In my personal opinion we gain nothing except Bagavathapacharam. No way we should feel proud to say that Swami sannidhi is not being taken care. It is being taken care well and ensured to follow the customs and usage as being followed by our ancestors. > > I once again humbly request you not to spread this kind of information unless and otherwise you have an authentic source. > > I request you not to post anything further in this regard. > > adiyen SriVaishnava Dasan
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |