You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - May 2003

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00059 May 2003

 
May 2003 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Shri Sampath Swamin,

Kindly read the recent post that Shri Rama Swamy has posted. The 
purpose of my post was to take every post with the right intent, if 
not we should at least get the clarification from the writer. If we 
say that the writer is saying something false and not the facts, then 
a) we are criticizing the writer without clarification(this is in 
fact Bhagavathapacharam) b) we are criticizing the moderator too for 
allowing a post that contains no facts. Please don't take my post 
wrong. Please take it in the right spirit. My apologies in case I had 
offended anyone.

I humbly request you to kindly check your statements - "No way we 
should feel proud to say that Swami sannidhi is not being taken 
care." - Why would you conclude that? No one is proud to say that 
swami sannidhi is not being take care. Everyone is definitely feeling 
bad(every Shri Vaishnava will feel bad and hence I think I can 
generalize). "It looks nothing but funny. " - Requesting again to 
read through Shri Rama Swami's post again and then make such comments.

Note: I still agree that I don't know the internal details. I only 
said "I think" what Shri Rama swamy says is true, due to the very 
reason that I know swamy and, knowing his Shri Vaishnava Lakshnam 
alone is enough to say so. Everyone will get to know about him when 
the right time comes. So, I don't think there is any contradiction in 
my post.

Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan,
Lakshmi Narasimhan

--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sampath kumar <pbsampathkumar@xxxx> 
wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Swamin,
> 
> I really feel sorry to write this mail, but circumstances have made 
to
> 
> write down. I sincerely apologise if this mail hurts any body, 
because my
> 
> intention is not hurt the bagavathas of this egroup but only to 
clarify certain
> 
> issues.
> 
> 
> At the outset, i find your statements are contradicting to each 
other. Earlier
> 
> you say you dont know internals of the temple and later you say 
whatever Shri Rama swami says is true. Can you just let me know how 
you were able to conclude that something is happening inside the 
temple.
> 
> Please let me know what is the necessity for posting it in this 
group instead of
> 
> contacting the appropriate authorities and ensure the temple 
operations are straightened. What is the authenticity for this 
information Sri Rama swami has? It looks nothing but funny. 
> 
> What do we gain by saying that Sriperumbudur is in a state of 
neglect, when it is not so. In my personal opinion we gain nothing 
except Bagavathapacharam. No way we should feel proud to say that 
Swami sannidhi is not being taken care. It is being taken care well 
and ensured to follow the customs and usage as being followed by our 
ancestors.
> 
> I once again humbly request you not to spread this kind of 
information unless and otherwise you have an authentic source.
> 
> I request you not to post anything further in this regard.
> 
> adiyen SriVaishnava Dasan






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list