Post 6
Dear srivaishNava perunthagaiyeer,
Continuing kamban's version on the `line of control' ? the lakshman
rEkhaa, the exact verse where lakshmana says who is equal to my raama
is here. [missed out to be given in the previous post, towards the
end, where it is referred]
eNmai aar ulaginil iraamaRku ERRam aar
thiNmaiyaar uLar enach cheppaRpaalarO
peNmaiyaal urai seyap peRudhiraal
uNmaiyaan anaiyavatku uNarak kooRinaan ? 5 raavaNan soozhchchip
padalam
Who can be talked as equal to raamaa in valour, or who has power to
kill raama in war. Original for comparison from vaalmeeki already
given as ?
avadhya: samarE raamO na Evam thvam vakthum arhasi || 3-45-13
Few points are already given in previous post. More now ? See here
the addressing of lakshmaNa by kamban ? `uNmaiyaan' ? the
personification of truth ? already we are enjoying lakshmaNa
as `renunciation personified' ? kamban says `truth'. Added one.
Further that word `anaiyavatku is to be considered as
anaiyavaL+ kku
anai + avaL +kku
and this is some thing very special.
anaiyavaL - annai avaL ? she, seethaa is my mother, saya lakshmaNa
anaiyavaL - ellaarkkum annai avaL, the universal mother.
anaiyavaL ? raamanin manaiviyaana anaiyavaL ? she, that raamaa's
wife, called seethaa,
anaiyavaL- so and so named seethaa.
See here another emphasis in that `uNarak kooRinaan' ? she has to
realize ? not in a mood to realize which is the truth ? that raama
can be killed by someone like that golden deer - what she believes is
NOT true, but what he says IS - oh mother seethaa, please realize
this ? so uNarak kooRinaan. KooRu means mind ? so kOOrinaan means
talking in such a way to make the other's mind to realize the truth,
and not believe falsehoods or to leave out falsehoods.
That status of seethaa as `goddess, mother and universal mother' is
available in vaalmeeki slokam also ? see -
uththaram na uthsahE vakthum dhaivatham bhavathee mama || 3-45-28
vaakyam aprathiroopam thu na chithram sthreeshu maithilee |
svabhaava: thu Esha naareeNaam Eshu lOkEshu dhrisyathE || 3-45-29
meaning already given in earlier posts.
When lakshmaNa said this ? seethaa started reacting violently ?
vayirththuk kooRuvaaL ? says kamban - already we saw vaalmeeki saying
she beat her stomach and said ? same scene projected by kamban also
here.
enRu avan iyambalum eduththa seeRRaththaL
onRana innalaL kothikkum uLLaththaL
ninRa nin nilai idhu neRiyiRRu anRu enaa
van thaRu kaNNinaL vayirththuk kooRuvaaL ?12 raavaNan soozhchchip
padalam
she has become angry, the mind is now boiling, fretting, fuming, the
eyes spitting fire, also started beating in her stomach and then
shouts at lakshmana. That vaalmeeki slOkam where he refers this
stomach beating is [meaning already given]
ithi lakshmaNam aasrutya seethaa duhkha samanvithaa |
paaNibhyaam rudhathee duhkhaad udharam prajaghaana ha || 3-45-38
Actually kamban did not describe what seetha said to lakshmaNa, `you
have a bad motif out of kaamam, have intentions of enjoying me when
my husband is not there, also bharatha has sent you with bad intenion
of snatching me like the kingdom he has gained' etc. That is a
variation between original [vaalmeeki], and tamil version [kamban].
So lakshmana now sees that he cannot avoid going ? so says to
seethaa -
pOginREn adiyanEn pugunthu vandhu kEdu
aaginRadhu arasan than aaNai neer maRuththu
Egu enReer irukkinReer thamiyeer enRu pin
pOginRa sinthaiyaan vidai koNdu Eginaan. ? 16 raavaNan soozhchchip
padalam
`dear manni ? you want me to go, ok I go, symptoms are bad here, king
has ordered not to leave you alone, but you want me to go, so I go
now' ? saying lakshmaNa left.
pOvadhu purival yaan pugundhathu uNdu enin
kaaval sei eruvaiyin thalaivan kaNNuRum
aavadhu kaakkum enRu aRiviththu avvazhi
DhEvar sei thavaththinaal semmal Eginaan ? 19 raavaNan soozhchchip
padalam
While going lakshmaNa says `eruvaiyin thalaivan kaNNuRum' ? the head
of the forest will take care of you, oh seethaa ? so I am going ? as
per your directions, whereas the king said other wise.
Again kamban reasons out ? `avvazhi DhEvar sei thavaththinaal semmal
Eginaan' ? why he left ? to fulfill the results of the penance done
by dhEvaas ? means this act of lakshmana is going to contribute to
the success of dhEvaas ? that raavaNan has to be killed.
So it is very clear that kamban also does not talk about drawing
about a `lakshman rEkha' ? drawing a `line of control' for seethaa ?
more in line with vaalmeeki.
Then wherefrom this theory of lakshman rEkha came from? Is it
thulasidhaas in his ramcharithmaanas. Let us see in next post.
Dhaasan
Vasudevan m.g.
azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |