Sarira Sariri ------------------ Sarira Sariri bhava means, per Sri Ramanuja, all the setinent (Chit) and Insentient (Achit) are the body of Bahaman . Hence all the Jeevas right from Brahma up to an Ant, are the Sariram of Lord. This includes matter, prakriti . Hence it is OK to consider 'Aham Brhamasmi' from that Paradigm. This is how elders view many passages in Vedas that eulogize Devas such as Indra, Varuna and Rudra. Even the great Advaitia Scholar and commentator of Sruti Vakhyams, Sri Vidyarananya held this view. I once heard (forgotten the source, apologies) that Even Sankara has similar comments in his Sri Vishnu Sahasranama Bhasya. Sesha/Seshi ------------------ The Lord is also the sustainer and 'Lord' (Easwara) of these all chit and achit things, from this viewpoint, all the Jeevas need to be subservient to Him. By virtue of his Kalyana Gunas (attributes), he is distinct and above all these devas. Adiyen Thanks KM Narayanan ---- Vidyalakshmi <vidya_lr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sri: > > Dear Sir, > > Adiyen does not understand what is meant by > '> From the view of Sarira Sariri Bhava of Sri > > Vishitadvaita, this is true. However, viewing from > > Seshi/sesha relationship, Srimad Bhagavatam clearly > > says which God is the primordial God. > ' > > Could you please elaborate this? > > Dasan. > > --- aravamudhan@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > Narasimhan Swamin, > > > > Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapuram is one of the 6 satvika > > puranams and per our Sri Vaishhava view it is > > considered authentic. > > > > I am also reading the series in the Thuklaq > > magazine. what the editor of > > Thuklaq is writing is the same way as all advaitins > > have been talking. It is not out of place to mention > > here about them as 'Prachanna Saivities' (disguised > > Saivas) > > > > It is true that Dattatreya's account is mentioned . > > None of our Acharyas would negate this. > > > > The very first slokam 'of Srimad Bhagavatam, > > beginning with 'Janmasyatya' clearly establishes > > Vishistadvaita. > > > > In several places in Srimad Baghavatam, the paratvam > > of Peruman is clearly established . > > > > Most of the quotes of our Alwars are only from > > Srimad Bhagavatam. > > > > The issue here is Sri Cho Ramaswamy (Editor, > > Thuklaq) chooses to > > elaborate only those place where it is convenient to > > advaitins and establish something such as 'all > > Mumoorthies are same' (Mumoorthy Samyam) > > > > From the view of Sarira Sariri Bhava of Sri > > Vishitadvaita, this is true. However, viewing from > > Seshi/sesha relationship, Srimad Bhagavatam clearly > > says which God is the primordial God. > > > > The blame need to go to the editor and not to the > > Srimad Bhagavata Mahapurnam. > > > > > > Adiyen, > > > > Regards > > KM Narayanan > > ---- Lakshmi Narasimhan <nrusimhann@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > First of all, is it worth reading such a book at > > all :) I wonder many > > > a times what authenticity would such books bring > > in?! > > > adiyEn, > > > rAmAnuja dAsan > > > > > > --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vidyalakshmi > > <vidya_lr@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sri: > > > > > > > > I was reading this week's edition of 'Hindu Maha > > > > Samuthram' in Thuglak. This talks about Srimad > > > > Bhagavatham - 2nd Baagam, 42nd Adhiyayam > > > > > > > > In this, it is said that Atri Muni's performed > > > > rigorous penance and prayed to the lord of all > > worlds > > > > that he should get a son equivalent to the lord > > of all > > > > worlds. Brahma, Vishnu and Sivan appeared before > > him > > > > and granted that Atri Maharishi will get three > > sons as > > > > the amsam of each of them and that there is no > > > > difference between the three. > > > > > > > > Why is there a contradiction like this in > > Bhagavatha > > > > Puranam, in the same series, i was also reading > > about > > > > other puranams where such things have been said. > > > > > > > > Could someone please explain this. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vidya. > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > Azhvar EmberumAnAr JeeyAr ThiruvadigalE Saranam http://www.vedics.net Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:ramanuja-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:ramanuja-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |