You are here: SriPedia - SriRangaSri - Archives - Jul 2003

SriRangaSri List Archive: Message 00066 Jul 2003

 
Jul 2003 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Bhagavatas:
The article of Sri MK Sudarshan prompted me to look back to an article written in 1999 in the Bhakti list in response to a criticism by an anonymous Bhagavta objecting to the use of the words "Swami" and "Devarir" while addressing an Acharya. I am reproducing the same for information.




Subj: SwAmi and dEvarir
Date: 8/20/99 7:07:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: Ramanbil@xxxx
Sender: bhakti-errors@xxxx
To: bhakti@xxxx


Dear Bhagavatas,

Please forgive me for writing about what is partially a personal
matter, but a recent occurrence among our small Sri Vaishnava
community here has prompted me to discuss some issues publicly.
Hopefully, we can all learn something in the process.

Usage of the term "swAmi"
-------------------------

During the Tele-upanyasam of H.H. Azhagiya singhar on 9th May 99,
I enquired him whether he had received the copy of my 20 part
write up eulogizing Prakritam Azhagiya singhar - sent to his camp
address earlier. (The AchArya has since acknowledged receipt and
conveyed his benediction through Sri Devanathan of AhObila Mutt,
Hyderabad). Several bhAgavatas were appreciative of this mentioning,
as they were previously unaware of the write up and now were able
to learn more about the kalyANa-guNas of the Prakritam Azhagiya
Singar, with whom I have been in close personal contact for
many years.

However, after this upanyAsam, one Bhagavata, (who unfortuantely has
preferred to remain anonymous), is reported to have observed:

" Sri Anbil kept addressing Azhagiyasingar as "swAmi", "dEvarir"
etc. This is actually considered as an insult in our sampradAyam.
'Azhagiyasingar" is the way with which we must address HH Jeeyar
(OR at least Jeeyar/Jeeyar swAmi etc for those who can't pronounce
"Azhagiyasingar" properly. "swAmi", "dEvarir" etc. are used for vidvAns,
bhAgavathAs in general. But, Azhagiyasingar is above such
vidvAns/bhAgavatAs for reasons we know. Thus one shouldn't insult
a matAtipati [sic] by such addressing. Of course, no one is doing this
intentionally. But, the standard maintained in our sampradAyam
must be known to others especially those who listen to the
upanyAsam on direct on-line connection".

I appreciate the depth of AchArya bhakti with which the said
bhAgavata took umbrage at the expressions "SwAmi" and 'dEvarir."
But is usage of expressions such as "SwAmi" and "dEvarir" for
Azhagiya Singar really an insult? This is the question I wish
to address.

Let me hasten to assure that my AchArya bhakti is second to none.
But, let's explore what "SwAmi" actually means. In one of his kAlakshepams
(in his PoorvAsramam), Azhagiya singhar himself explained the etymology
of the word "swAmi" to bring home what a powerfully respectable word
it is.

He explained:

The word "swAmi" is made up of "swam" meaning "property" and
"ami" meaning "Possessor" (i.e.,) the owner of the property.
And, that the word "swAmi" conveys the "sEshatvam" and
"dAsatvam" of the person addressing to the person addressed.

In other words, the word expresses the *Lordship* or the
*mastership* or the *ownership* of the addressee in relation to
the status of the person addressing - being the *servant* and the
*property* of the * Lord - master - owner * - a property which could
even be sold by the owner in terms of Periyalwar's statement
"PesuvAr aDiyArgal yenthammai virkavum peruvArgal" (4.4.10)

In my humble opinion, there is perhaps no better word than "swAmi"
which packs in itself the power and punch of all this significance
especially when addressing an AchArya on one-to-one basis in the
2nd person.

You will remember how Azhagiya singhar in his Tele-upanyasam
On 1st August 99 made a point that in "*Unn* aDikkeezh amarndu
pugunthEn", Nammalwar found it more effective to address the Lord
in 2nd person than using a vague and nondescript 3rd person expression.

As everyone in our group knows, my relationship with Azhagiya singhar has been
intimate, up, close and personal spanning well over 20 years:

- before as friend, philosopher and guide,
- during his Sannyasa Sweekaranam when he became "Chinna Azhagiya singhar and
- thereafter, when he became mathAdhipathi as"Azhagiya singhar".

I say this not to boast but to express my great fortune at my having
had such a connection; Azhagiya singhar has been gracious enough to
have written an introduction for me, which many of you have read before
on these lists.

Now, besides being my AchArya, he continues to be my "friend, philosopher and guide".

In all my personal conversations and communications with
Azhagiya singhar, Poundarika puram Andavan and other mathAdhipatis.,
I have been using 'swAmi" and dEvarir" while addressing them.

None of them had taken exception to this because -

* They know that when I use these words, I do so with full and
complete understanding of their spirit and significance as per
the above clarification of Azhagiya singhar.

* They know that the words were used with genuine feelings of
'sEshatvam' and "dAsatvam" to the AachArya.

* They also know that they were within the respectable
norms and "standards maintained in our sampradAyam" and

* They know that no 'disrespect' or 'insult' either intentional
or unintentional was involved.

I am, however, thankful to the anonymous bhAgavata for the small mercy
in conceding, "Of course, no one is doing this intentionally".

The objection by the aforesaid bhAgavata arises because, the
word 'swAmi' has become another casualty like "aDiyEn."
By constant overuse and abuse, it seems to have lost its spirit
and charm and has been irreparably trivialized.

For example, it has so degenerated that we see devotees of
"Ayyappa" greeting each other - "*sAmi* saranam'.
Obviously, they do so without even knowing what they are saying!

Our psyche has been conditioned by the indiscriminate
and mindless misuse of the word "swAmi" ad nauseam from
"Alpha swAmi" to "Omega swAmi" and everyone liberally ensconced
in between like, for example, "pAmban "swAmi", "mouna swAmi" and
even a "soraikkAi swAmi"- rendering it cheap, if not vulgar.

Thus, it has been debased and desecrated so much so that
we tend to underestimate the power of the word and think that
it cannot be applied to ' madathipatis' but only to ordinary
'' vidvAns" and "bhAgavatas in general."

If the word were taboo, why would our AchAryas call
'swAmi Nammalwar," 'swAmi NAthamuni", 'swAmi Desikan" etc
whenever they refer to them?

Does it mean that they were no better than mill-of-the run
'vidvAns' and commonplace 'bhAgavatas' and NOT AchAryas?

I respectfully submit that the usage of these terms
only expresses an obeisance to an AchArya (in this case my
genuine obeisance to *my* acharya).

Usage of the term dEvarir
-------------------------

"dEvarir" is a Tamil word derived from the Sanskrit "devaha"
which means "God." "dEvarir" means "Oh! My God!"- In essence,
all that the word ' swAmi ' connotes as explained above.

I quote a great authority on the use of the word:

"dEvarir being a Tamil word has no etymology I could think of.
It is a respectful term, while speaking to elders or *AachAryA *
as you know"

For me, my AachArya is God incarnate. I believe that there can
be no power-words comparable to "swAmi" and "dEvarir"
especially while addressing an AachArya in the 2nd person on
one-to-one basis.

How incongruous would it have been if Arjuna had addressed Lord
Krishna, the GeethAchAryan in the 3rd person as if he was
referring to some odd and distant third person and not the Jagadguru,
standing physically in front of him face to face and delivering ' the Song celestial?'

The use of the term "Azhagiya singhar" at every step, in season
and out of season, in the "3rd person" smacks of distancing as if
addressing some " 3rd person" and not the AachArya physically
listening to you, and conversing with you - while 'swAmi" and
" dEvarir" exude genuine humility and devotion and denote a
closeness that is unique and satisfying to both the
AachArya and the sishya.

In this context, the individual opinion of the said bhAgavata becomes
out of place.

That is why the form "Azhagiya singhar" was not used
repeatedly - not because of any difficulty in 'pronouncing' it.'

My request to the anonymous bhAgavata and others who share his/her
opinions is this: please, do not impugn the motives or attitudes
of others, particularly when such criticisms are made from a dearth
of knowledge and experience. If such criticism must be made, please
justify it with suitable pramANas.

Dasoham
Anbil Ramaswamy

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list