Dear Moderator, I do not disagree with sriman Hari. I also would like to add that many swamies write lengthy messages and most of the times adding no real value to the main message they intend to convey.Longer the message more investment of precious time for the reader bhagavatas too!. I request for a curtailment on the length of a message (ideally one page) so bhagavathas conveniently get the crisp messages in as short time as possible. sajjana padapadma paramanuhu Lakshmi Narasimha dasan "M.S.HARI Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari" <mshari@xxxx> wrote: Dear Moderator, I find s.ramachandran@xxxx to have mentioned the following: > of Lord Shiva - who is considered a Nayanmar, the equivalent of an > Alwar.. . Such comparisons are not fit to be told before scholars. I request the moderators to interfere. In the name of stressing SandyA vandanam, let us not entertain things like advaitam, pASupatham that are opposed to VEdAnta-darSanam. I have been going through many postings of this person. He has once reffered to a famous Advaita scholar and stressed SandyA vandanam. In advaita, finally, the karma is also not reality. One may argue that we can take the good points from other darSanams also. I agree. But the source should not be totally misleading finally. Thanks & Regards naidhruva mAdabhUshi S. HARI rAmAnuja dAsan (mshari@xxxx) Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Srirangasri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |