<< Date: 97-03-06 07:26:42 EST
From: TrlBlzrOne
To: A.E.Manier.1@nd.edu
In a message dated 97-03-05 16:08:54 EST, you write:
> Listen jerk, if you want me to think you know something about Heidegger
or
>Hegel I don't, put something in writing.
> EZ
Sure, we can do that...
Unbeknownst to Hegel and Heidegger, the Eckhardian nihilo essentially
delivers the self to the reifying alienation of the impersonal operations of
the biogenic and dialectical syntheis, which is itself compromised by the
further erosion precipitated by materialistic reductionism, producing the
ontic surd as the only realistic alternative to the self; notwithstanding
this movement toward the ontic surd, the emergence of self-negating
genealogical subjectivity and irrationalism gives rise to pseudo-scientistic
objectification of entropic dynamism in turn producing axiomatic
transactional change in the original Eckhardian nihilo, thereby creating a
negative noosphere in which the alienated triadic signifyer confronts, not
the comfort of the ontic surd, but the even more fundamental phenomenon of
the isochastic digital sign as the ironic end point.*
I hope this is helpful....
*references furnished on request
Jim
>>
---------------------
Forwarded message:
Subj: Fwd: Buzz off!
Date: 97-03-09 07:02:55 EST
From: TrlBlzrOne
To: Matthias.Staab@dm.krinfo.ch
In a message dated 97-03-06 07:26:42 EST, TrlBlzrOne writes:
<< Subj: Re: Buzz off!
Matthias:
I mentioned in my last post that I had sent a piece which I hoped would be
understood as an ironic spoof in reply to Professor Manier. I did send such
a note, but in reviewing my mailbox to get rid of stuff, I note that my reply
was to a note which he sent to me privately, not to the board...at least it
appears that way--can you tell me if the piece below did appear on the board
or not?
Date: 97-03-06 07:26:42 EST
From: TrlBlzrOne
To: A.E.Manier.1@nd.edu
In a message dated 97-03-05 16:08:54 EST, you write:
> Listen jerk, if you want me to think you know something about Heidegger or
>Hegel I don't, put something in writing.
> EZ
Sure, we can do that...
Unbeknownst to Hegel and Heidegger, the Eckhardian nihilo essentially
delivers the self to the reifying alienation of the impersonal operations of
the biogenic and dialectical syntheis, which is itself compromised by the
further erosion precipitated by materialistic reductionism, producing the
ontic surd as the only realistic alternative to the self; notwithstanding
this movement toward the ontic surd, the emergence of self-negating
genealogical subjectivity and irrationalism gives rise to pseudo-scientistic
objectification of entropic dynamism in turn producing axiomatic
transactional change in the original Eckhardian nihilo, thereby creating a
negative noosphere in which the alienated triadic signifyer confronts, not
the comfort of the ontic surd, but the even more fundamental phenomenon of
the isochastic digital sign as the ironic end point.*
I hope this is helpful....
*references furnished on request
Jim
---------------------
Forwarded message:
Subj: Re: Buzz off!
Date: 97-03-06 07:26:42 EST
From: TrlBlzrOne
To: A.E.Manier.1@nd.edu
In a message dated 97-03-05 16:08:54 EST, you write:
> Listen jerk, if you want me to think you know something about Heidegger or
>Hegel I don't, put something in writing.
> EZ
Sure, we can do that...
Unbeknownst to Hegel and Heidegger, the Eckhardian nihilo essentially
delivers the self to the reifying alienation of the impersonal operations of
the biogenic and dialectical syntheis, which is itself compromised by the
further erosion precipitated by materialistic reductionism, producing the
ontic surd as the only realistic alternative to the self; notwithstanding
this movement toward the ontic surd, the emergence of self-negating
genealogical subjectivity and irrationalism gives rise to pseudo-scientistic
objectification of entropic dynamism in turn producing axiomatic
transactional change in the original Eckhardian nihilo, thereby creating a
negative noosphere in which the alienated triadic signifyer confronts, not
the comfort of the ontic surd, but the even more fundamental phenomenon of
the isochastic digital sign as the ironic end point.*
I hope this is helpful....
*references furnished on request
Jim
Jim