15
PROTEST LETTER
After three weeks of intensive
work, participants coming from
16
Protest Letter Written in Chinese
17
Protest Letter Written in Japanese
18
TRANSLATED FROM PROTEST LETTERS
WRITTEN IN JAPANESE
AND CHINESE
This is a passage concerning our strong feelings during the past three weeks and have their roots as follows:
Be it an open conference or small group discussions, participants' speed of speaking and attitude towards those who are handicapped in English have led us to a very great dissatisfaction, especially the feeling of being taken for granted. Does it mean that we have to bear with such unfriendly attitude due to our language barrier? This has made us feel secondary in position to the better English speakers and in addition, not being accepted by the group. Thus, the claim that all of us are one under the name of Jesus Christ is being questioned and is not comprehensible to us.
This strong frustration feeling has over-ridden our enthusiasm to enhance a better relationship with the other participants which is not only a loss to us but an even magnified loss to the whole conference. We really do not wish such a situation to persist on till our return to our home countries when we mill share with our fellow countrymen, not only the regional friendship but also the frustration that we have felt here.
On the other hand, we must say that me are milling to believe that most of the participants are not treating us with such an attitude intentionally. It may have been an unconscious act.
Our disadvantaged English-speaking position has placed us as part of the "minorities problems" that we have all along been discussing. Hence, we would like to call upon the direct attention of all participants with regards to this problem.
Just like the slight progress of women's issues seen only yesterday, we wish that with the fast approaching final stage of this programme which is also the peak of HRD '87, each and every participant should be given the opportunity to exhibit his/her abilities and express his/her opinions. But without an improvement in the language problem, not only are the participants’ wishes for expression being scaled down but at the same time, it is very difficult for us to proceed with the discussion. Most importantly, HRD ‘87 may not be considered as a success after all.