Search found 4 matches
- March 12th, 2014, 12:41 am
- Forum: New Testament
- Topic: Is the lack of a verb in Luke 16.16a conspicuous?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 796
Re: Is the lack of a verb in Luke 16.16a conspicuous?
I figured that was the most likely option; but I started doubting it for a second, in light of the quasi-technical sense that εὐαγγελίζω had acquired, where it's almost exclusively used in these parts of the NT to refer to the Christian kerygma. That we have the standard association here with ἡ βασι...
- March 11th, 2014, 8:31 pm
- Forum: New Testament
- Topic: Is the lack of a verb in Luke 16.16a conspicuous?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 796
Is the lack of a verb in Luke 16.16a conspicuous?
The verse as a whole reads ὁ νόμος καὶ οἱ προφῆται μέχρι Ἰωάννου ἀπὸ τότε ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ εὐαγγελίζεται καὶ πᾶς εἰς αὐτὴν βιάζεται. Many translations have an (implied) verb - whether a simple verb of being, or something like "were proclaimed" - when translating ὁ νόμος καὶ οἱ προφῆται ...
- July 26th, 2013, 12:18 am
- Forum: New Testament
- Topic: Translating κατὰ ἀνθρώπους (and κατὰ θεὸν) in 1 Peter 4.6?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 695
Re: Translating κατὰ ἀνθρώπους (and κατὰ θεὸν) in 1 Peter 4.
Is there no edit button around here? I meant to say that texts like Mt 16:27 (ἀποδώσει ἑκάστῳ κατὰ τὴν πρᾶξιν αὐτοῦ) and Rom 2.6 are different due to the presence of personal pronoun[/u].
- July 25th, 2013, 9:39 pm
- Forum: New Testament
- Topic: Translating κατὰ ἀνθρώπους (and κατὰ θεὸν) in 1 Peter 4.6?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 695
Translating κατὰ ἀνθρώπους (and κατὰ θεὸν) in 1 Peter 4.6?
1 Pet 4.6: ...εἰς τοῦτο γὰρ καὶ νεκροῖς εὐηγγελίσθη ἵνα κριθῶσι μὲν κατὰ ἀνθρώπους σαρκὶ ζῶσι δὲ κατὰ θεὸν πνεύματι. NRSV: "...for this is the reason the gospel was proclaimed even to the dead, so that, though they had been judged in the flesh [as everyone is judged], they might live in the spi...