I take your point, however Michael Rudolph is listing his title as “Emerging faithfulness in a context of hostility: a structural analysis of the gospel of John”, if he is indeed referring to the same book. So there would seem to be some more descriptive content than just John to the chapter headers at least
MAubrey wrote: ↑July 24th, 2020, 8:49 am
Well, I guess I should say then, I personally don't know what I would have done with a more descriptive title!
Fontes Press seem to be on a roll with the discourse studies - here is one upcoming on 1 peter by Starwalt. Perhaps a book length treatment of his chapter in Scacewater's book?
"New Testament scholars have long questioned 1 Peter's structural and content unity. Furthermore, scholars divide over the existence of the so-called imperatival participle, both in general and within Peter's first epistle. Ervin Starwalt utilizes a full top-down and bottom-up discourse analysis methodology to provide a solution to both problems."
Matthew Longhorn wrote: ↑July 24th, 2020, 3:00 pm
Fontes Press seem to be on a roll with the discourse studies - here is one upcoming on 1 peter by Starwalt. Perhaps a book length treatment of his chapter in Scacewater's book?
"New Testament scholars have long questioned 1 Peter's structural and content unity. Furthermore, scholars divide over the existence of the so-called imperatival participle, both in general and within Peter's first epistle. Ervin Starwalt utilizes a full top-down and bottom-up discourse analysis methodology to provide a solution to both problems."
It's probably a revision of Ervin's dissertation on the same topic.
Mike Aubrey, Linguist
SIL International
Koine-Greek.com
I just got this through today. Scacewater’s introduction is worth a read in its own right as it gives an overview of the current issues and concepts in discourse analysis as it stands at the moment. I am going to have to take a while on this intro alone - lots of stuff I am not familiar with