Relevance theory
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 8:57 am
-
- Posts: 3351
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Relevance theory
Not yet, but it's on my long to-do list.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: November 10th, 2017, 2:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Relevance theory
Rather than create a new thread I was wondering whether anyone has had more thoughts on this?
I have enjoyed Margaret Sims work on ina and hoti using relevance theory and her book “a relevant way to read”.
I have also noted with interest Fantin’s incorporation of it into his book on the imperative mood although I am in the early parts of this book right now
I have enjoyed Margaret Sims work on ina and hoti using relevance theory and her book “a relevant way to read”.
I have also noted with interest Fantin’s incorporation of it into his book on the imperative mood although I am in the early parts of this book right now
-
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: August 9th, 2012, 4:19 pm
Re: Relevance theory
Matthew,
In 2004 there was a rather long thread on this posted at b-Hebrew. You might find it amusing if not enlightening.
Participants in the thread include Reinier de Blois, Peter Kirk, and several others.
https://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-h ... 20323.html
In 2004 there was a rather long thread on this posted at b-Hebrew. You might find it amusing if not enlightening.
Participants in the thread include Reinier de Blois, Peter Kirk, and several others.
https://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-h ... 20323.html
C. Stirling Bartholomew