Acts passim and 1Pt.3:13 κακοῦν / κάκωσις

Forum rules
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
Eeli Kaikkonen
Posts: 621
Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 7:49 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Acts passim and 1Pt.3:13 κακοῦν / κάκωσις

Post by Eeli Kaikkonen »

Stephen Hughes wrote: Does anyone know or have a way to know whether the action described by κακοῦν / κάκωσις refers to (a) brief or (b) protracted bouts of bad things happening?

I am hoping that someone has come to a conclusion about this point from their own way of discovering nuance and meaning can share their conclusion. ;)
I too find this thread frustrating. So I just to try to answer your question.

Based on my instinct I would say that the lexemes themselves don't imply one or another. It's mainly about semantics / encyclopedic knowledge interface. Pure abstracted semantic meaning is always limited and the final understanding comes by attaching encyclopedic knowledge (knowledge about the real world, how things are, work and happen etc.) to it. I personally tend to underinterprete language rather than overinterprete. Therefore I would say that those actions mentioned are expressed just as happening, not as brief or protracted, but just that they happened. To fill in the gap between semantics and real world you have to know the real world. If you don't know something, you have to stick to what is expressed. You can't load words with semantics they don't have. You find out the semantics by the normal procedure: find examples where something is clearly part of the semantics, brought in by the lexeme itself, not context. So, do your have any unambiguous examples where the distinction between (a) and (b) must be semantic, not contextual? Or do lexicons imply such distinction?

(So you have here both my conclusion and reasoning.)

(EDIT: the questions can be taken to be rhetorical, nobody has to answer them.)
Stephen Carlson
Posts: 3355
Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Acts passim and 1Pt.3:13 κακοῦν / κάκωσις

Post by Stephen Carlson »

Let me add my voice to the feeling of frustration. As I've mentioned a couple of times in similar threads, this is the kind of question where a good corpus study might help, if at all. We can get a sense of a word's connotations by looking at the contexts it inhabits. Without those contexts, we're in a dark room looking for a black cat that may not even be there.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Post Reply

Return to “New Testament”