Page 1 of 1

Word order 2 Peter 1:1 τοῖς ἰσότιμον ἡμῖν λαχοῦσιν πίστιν

Posted: May 1st, 2015, 1:08 pm
by Stephen Hughes
Συμεὼν Πέτρος, δοῦλος καὶ ἀπόστολος Ἰησοῦ χριστοῦ, τοῖς ἰσότιμον ἡμῖν λαχοῦσιν πίστιν ἐν δικαιοσύνῃ τοῦ θεοῦ ἡμῶν καὶ σωτῆρος Ἰησοῦ χριστοῦ· 2 χάρις ὑμῖν καὶ εἰρήνη πληθυνθείη ἐν ἐπιγνώσει τοῦ θεοῦ, καὶ Ἰησοῦ τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν·
I find that the word order of τοῖς ἰσότιμον ἡμῖν λαχοῦσιν πίστιν is striking. I can't find where the forum has discussed it before.

At first glance, I take it as a mixed construction combining the epistolary formula - Συμεὼν Πέτρος (person A) ... τῷ/τοῖς (to person B) ... χαίρειν (salutation) - combined with the word-order of a balance of ἰσότιμον ἡμῖν with πίστιν over λαχοῦσιν.

Has this aspect of the verse been discussed before? Have other taken this as a mixed construction?

The verse has been discussed before; [B-Greek] FW: 2 Peter 1:1 EN as "by" or "in"

Re: Word order 2 Peter 1:1 τοῖς ἰσότιμον ἡμῖν λαχοῦσιν πίστι

Posted: May 1st, 2015, 6:22 pm
by Stephen Carlson
ἡμῖν is in the second position of its prosodic domain (note the orthographic comma after an apposition -- and the article does not count for position), where many prosodically weak words like to hang out. You see it again in the second verse, χάρις ὑμῖν καὶ εἰρήνη, "grace and peace to you."

Re: Word order 2 Peter 1:1 τοῖς ἰσότιμον ἡμῖν λαχοῦσιν πίστι

Posted: May 2nd, 2015, 11:29 am
by Stephen Hughes
To state the obvious, the authour has used an allowable word order for the finite verb forms and applied it to the participle construction. Perhaps he didn't see a clear enough distinction between finite and infinite and so gave himself too much freedom.