Discoourse cohesion, Zero Anaphora & Maj Text
Matthew Brook O'Donnell
m.odonnell at roehampton.ac.uk
Mon Dec 4 12:40:34 EST 2000
>
> The use of a full explicit name to indicate a participant who is already
> predominate in the larger discourse reduces the level of cohesion between
> the discourse segments.
I'm not sure I agree with you here. A reference to a participant is still a
cohesive tie, whatever the form. From the textual stand point a full reference
to a participant adds another element to the participant chain and thus builds
cohesion.
> The use of an anaphoric pronoun or zero anaphora to
> indicate the same participant forces the reader to "remember" the
> participant and thus increases the discourse cohesion between the discourse
> segments. Of course there are other good reasons for using a full explicit
> noun phrase to name a participant. I was just highlighting one aspect of the
> question.
>
The psychological/cognitive effect of a full reference is not necessarily linked
to the textual cohesion. Even with a full reference the reader may have to do
some 'remembering' as to what and who the participant is in the discourse.
> You have an interesting e-mail address.
>
Oh? Why is that?
>
--
Matthew Brook O'Donnell
OpenText.org
Centre for Advanced Theological Research
University of Surrey Roehampton
80 Roehampton Lane
London
SW15 5SL
tel. (0181) 392 3000 ext. 4162
fax. (0181) 392 3491
e-mail: m.odonnell at roehampton.ac.uk
http://www.OpenText.org
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list