A dislocated EKLEKTOIS
Mark Wilson
emory2002 at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 5 00:39:30 EDT 2000
1 Peter 1:1,2
Why is EKLEKTOIS (in verse 1) so far removed from KATA PROGNWSIN (in verse
2)?
Does this grammatical "dislocation" communicate something at the semantic
level?
Most commentaries I have checked somewhat note this structure but seem to be
more distracted by the larger issue of Election. Also, all commentaries I
referenced separated EKLEKTOIS from PAREPIDHOIS DIASPORAS, as if an
appositional relationship was not a consideration.
What am I to make of all this?
hH CARIS MEQ' hUMWN,
Mark Wilson
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list