[B-Greek] 1 cor 10:9 TON KURION referent?
Vasile Stancu
stancu at mail.dnttm.ro
Fri Sep 19 16:41:44 EDT 2008
Considering the structure of the sentence, my impression is that there is a
common object here for both EKPEIRAZWMEN and ECEPEIRASAN, in which case,
being that the example of the OT incident is intended as reference to NT
times, the referent of TON KURION should be consistent with the OT allusion.
Vasile STANCU
-----Original Message-----
From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Kline
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 1:45 AM
To: greek B-Greek
Subject: [B-Greek] 1 cor 10:9 TON KURION referent?
1COR. 10:9 MHDE EKPEIRAZWMEN TON CRISTON [KURION Aleph, B], KAQWS
TINES AUTWN EPEIRASAN KAI hUPO TWN OFEWN APWLLUNTO.
Assuming[1] we were to accept the reading of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus,
how would we go about determining the referent of TON KURION? Would we
look at the OT allusions in 1Cor10 or would we use a statistical
approach, mesuring how hO KURIOS is used in Paul and the rest of the NT?
Elizabeth Kline
[1] Please note this is NOT a question about the relative merits of
the p46, D, etc reading. The question assumes TON KURION. As Robertson
& Plummer ICC page 206 note, the other readings CRISTON and QEON might
be a gloss to explain the meaning, i.e. identify the referent of
KURION. My question is how would we go about determining the referent
of TON KURION?
---
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list