Re: Gen 3:16 LXX & Susan T. Foh

From: Roe (d.roe@t-online.de)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 14:14:23 EDT


clayton stirling bartholomew schrieb:

> I am not sure it would. The more I think about this the more I am inclined
> to concluded that the LXX reading here cannot be harmonized with Foh's
> interpretation.

But maybe with the "diversion, amusement" definition, it could
satisfactorily be harmonized with Wevers... (?)

BTW, (thanks to Maurice's tip on the DOULOS review), I found a review on
a book that might help (The Text of Genesis 1-11: Textual Studies and
Critical Edition):

http://www.bookreviews.org/Reviews/0195119614.html

David

D. W. Roe
Rheiland-Pfalz, Germany

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:39:51 EST