From: Steve Puluka (spuluka@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 30 2000 - 06:41:57 EDT
<x-html>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Mark Wilson"
<<A
href="mailto:emory2002@hotmail.com">emory2002@hotmail.com</A>><BR>>
snip<BR>> Do we have today access to the "same" LXX that Paul used? (Perhaps
in<BR>Paul's<BR>> day it was similar to ours. We have thousands of mss. Many
of them differ<BR>> here and there. How can we know WHICH LXX Paul was using
in order to<BR>> conclude that he was not quoting verbatim?)<BR><BR>For a
discussion on the text traditions of the Septuagint see Jellicoe,
The<BR>Septuagint and Modern Study. He outlines all of the major
manuscipts and a<BR>history of the text transmission. He also outlines the
various theories on<BR>the original text.<BR>><BR>> Also, do we have the
same MT today that existed in Paul's day?<BR>><BR>For the same discussion of
the MT see Tov, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew<BR>Bible.<BR><BR>Steve
Puluka<BR>Consultar for Adult Education<BR>Byzantine Catholic Archeparchy of
Pittsburgh<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:39:54 EST