From: Mike Sangrey (mike@sojurn.lns.pa.us)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 09:15:17 EST
Ben Crick <ben.crick@argonet.co.uk> said:
>
> So the author of Matthew means the whole O.T. corpus, right up to and
> including John the Baptist. That would probably include what we call
> the Pseudepigrapha as well (such as the Books of Enoch, etc, apparently
> cited in 2 Peter and Jude).
You know, I hadn't looked at it like this. The question immediately
popped into my mind of whether John potentially wrote something. I
wonder?? Should
PANTES GAR hOI PROFHTAI KAI hO NOMOS hEWS IWANNOU EPROFHTEUSAN:
also refer to the oral tradition? The plural verb would then refer to the
plurality of messages, not writings or authors. Interesting.
Thanks Ben; this is thought provoking.
-- Mike Sangrey mike@sojurn.lns.pa.us Landisburg, Pa. It's OK to think differently, just think together. Sooner or later that will bring out our faults; then we can deal with them...together.--- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:40:05 EST