From: Matthew Brook O'Donnell (m.odonnell@roehampton.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Dec 04 2000 - 12:40:34 EST
>
> The use of a full explicit name to indicate a participant who is already
> predominate in the larger discourse reduces the level of cohesion between
> the discourse segments.
I'm not sure I agree with you here. A reference to a participant is still a
cohesive tie, whatever the form. From the textual stand point a full reference
to a participant adds another element to the participant chain and thus builds
cohesion.
> The use of an anaphoric pronoun or zero anaphora to
> indicate the same participant forces the reader to "remember" the
> participant and thus increases the discourse cohesion between the discourse
> segments. Of course there are other good reasons for using a full explicit
> noun phrase to name a participant. I was just highlighting one aspect of the
> question.
>
The psychological/cognitive effect of a full reference is not necessarily linked
to the textual cohesion. Even with a full reference the reader may have to do
some 'remembering' as to what and who the participant is in the discourse.
> You have an interesting e-mail address.
>
Oh? Why is that?
>
-- Matthew Brook O'Donnell OpenText.org Centre for Advanced Theological Research University of Surrey Roehampton 80 Roehampton Lane London SW15 5SLtel. (0181) 392 3000 ext. 4162 fax. (0181) 392 3491
e-mail: m.odonnell@roehampton.ac.uk
--- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:40:08 EST