From: Carlton Winbery (winberyc@speedgate.net)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:49:13 EST
Ivers wrote;
>
>How would you explain Acts 27:37: HMEQA DE hAI PASAI YUCAI EN TWi PLOIWi 276?
>An ALWAYS rule has no exceptions.
You are certainly correct concerning this construction as an attributive
use of PAS. I thought I had checked Accordance and it did not reveal this
exception. I went back and checked and I had used the wrong PAS in
Accordance. When I checked it properly I found two other exceptions in Acts.
Acts 19:7 OI PANTES ANDRES
Acts 20:18 TON PANTA CRONON
Acts 27:37 AI PASAI YUCA
Is it significant that all are in Acts?
--- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:40:14 EST