From: Mark Wilson (emory2oo2@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2001 - 22:55:34 EDT
<x-flowed>
Iver wrote:
>What do others says?
ESTIN DE PISTIS ELPIZOMENWN hUPOSTATIS
PRAGMATWN ELEGCOS OU BLEPOMENWN
Ok Iver, here's my stab at Heb. 11:1:
"In fact, doctrine is the underlying structure (in the sense of: divine 
provision) from which we receive confidence, the proof of matters not seen."
PISTIS often has the sense of that which is believed, namely, the body of 
truth or doctrine. Here, I take it in its passive sense.
ELPIZOMENWN  is passive (we receive), and "from which" brings out its 
Ablative function. That is, doctrine is the source of our confidence, not 
our human, frail faith.
hUPOSTATIS receives "underlying structure" as part of BDAG's first 
definition, but it seems to slightly miss it to me, so I added a clarifying 
parenthetical remark.
My thoughts,
Mark Wilson
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu</x-flowed>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:40:24 EST