From: rickstamp@gmx.net
Date: Thu Jun 28 2001 - 16:17:32 EDT
I have seen it stated that it is a logical fallacy when one assumes that a conditional statement is also true in the reverse as in "If A, then B is not equal to if non-A, then non-B) as described by Wallace on page 687. Could one also state that this is also the case for "if not B then not A"? Assume a third class conditional with EAN + subjunctive followed by an apodosis in the future.
Sincerely,
Rick Stamp
--- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:40:32 EST