[b-greek] Re: John 9.41

From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 26 2001 - 07:05:52 EST


At 7:04 PM -0800 12/25/01, Alan B. Thomas wrote:
>EIPEN AUTOIS hO IHSOUS EI TUFLOI HTE
>OUK AN EICETE hAMARTIAN
>NUN DE LEGETE hOTI BLEPOMEN
>hH hAMARTIA hUMWN MENEI
>
>Overlooking the handy accent marks in the GNT,
>would anyone object to identifying MENEI as
>future tense?

Granted that MENEI, where there's no MS evidence for accenting, could be
EITHER a present indicative 3d sg. OR a future indicative 3d sg., I don't
see any COMPELLING reason in the context to identify it as one rather than
the other.

-- 

Carl W. Conrad Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus) Most months: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243 cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwconrad@ioa.com WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/

--- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:40:53 EST