[b-greek] Re: implied verbs in Rom 5.18

From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 11:32:43 EST


At 10:11 AM -0500 1/8/02, Paul, Doug wrote:
>Romans 8:31 is similar in that there are no verbs in:
>
>EI hO QEOS hUPER hHMWN TIS KAQ hHMWN

Not really; this is standard omission of a copula (ESTIN) between a clearly
indicated subject (hO QEOS, TIS) and a clearly indicated predicate (hUPER
hHMWN, KAQ' hHMWN).

Rom 5:18, on the other hand, makes the verbal force reside in the verbal
nouns and adverbial prepositional phrases.

-- 

Carl W. Conrad Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus) Most months: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243 cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwconrad@ioa.com WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/

--- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 11 2002 - 18:40:54 EST