From: Calr (credmond@usa.pipeline.com)
Date: Sat Jan 06 1996 - 17:30:02 EST
On Jan 06, 1996 12:32:24, 'Will Wagers <wagers@computek.net>' wrote:
>Cal Redmond writes:
>
>> By my reasoning, then, Greek is not far removed - if removed at all-
>>from the historical Jeus.
>
>Jesus, a Hellenized Jew!
>
>Hellenization incarnate? Sort of a personification of a historical
process?
>A node in the rebounding culture shock wave of Alexander? Many Greek
>myths serve similar purposes. A "historical" Jesus, indeed!
>
>What *are* they teaching in seminaries these days?
>
>Will
>
>
-- The point here is that many of us are asking whether there was such a thing as a non-hellenized Jew except in George Foot Moore's imagination. While the degrees of hellenization may (and almost certainly did) vary, the dichotomy between Hellenistic and Palestinian Judaism is increasingly rejected by scholars. If speaking Greek makes Jesus a "hellenized Jew" (Will's phrase, not mine"), then so be it, but what I am saying is different, I think, than what Will means by "a hellinzed Jew." What "they are teaching in seminaries these days" is the need to try to examine the available evidence without prejudice to try to let the evidence lead us to conclusions rather than let our conclusions reinterpret the evidence. Did Jesus speak Greek? An unanswerable question, of course, but it is certainly within the realm of possibility. What I didn't see in Will's response was a challenge to the findings I presented. Cal Redmond The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary credmond@usa.pipeline.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:35 EDT