From: Carlton Winbery (winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net)
Date: Wed Jan 17 1996 - 11:12:53 EST
Ed Hobbs wrote;
>I don't understand either of Carleton's posts on this.
> (1) Loeb says SE (p. 326) in both printings I have (1946 and 1950).
>Does Carleton have an altered text of some sort? Or was a misprint
>introduced?
> (2) Kirsopp Lake translates: "You I should have held worthy of
>discussion" = "I should have held you worthy of discuission." Either way,
>in English the "you" is a direct object of the verb, just as the SE is in
>the Greek. Are we somehow dealing with different texts?
> The Greek looks very simple and straightforward to me. I'm puzzled
>over the confusion.
>
Ed Hobbs is right. I walked back to my office and checked again and find
that I was influenced by the original post and Lake's translation. And I
always said to graduate students, "Check it again!" I guess that's the
wonderful thing about this lists. If you get it wrong someone will correct
it, thankfully.
And also red faced,
Carlton
END
Carlton L. Winbery
Prof. Religion
LA College, Pineville, La
winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:36 EDT