From: David L. Moore (dvdmoore@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Jul 05 1996 - 14:46:06 EDT
Carl W. Conrad wrote:
> It struck me that in the initial discussion of Phil 2:6 by Al Kidd there
> was a strange and unnecessary argument about the article TO used with EINAI
> here. It is, I really think, the article used with the infinitive to
> indicate clearly the primary (subject) accusative with which hARPAGMON, as
> a substantive predicate accusative, is equated by hHGHSATO.
Carl's suggestion on this point is quite plausible. If we accepted the article
in this sense, might it also have an anaphoric function?
-- David L. Moore Director Miami, Florida, USA Department of Education dvdmoore@ix.netcom.com Southeastern Spanish District http://www.netcom.com/~dvdmoore of the Assemblies of God
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:46 EDT