Re: Re Php 2:6 (2d response to David Moore)

From: David L. Moore (dvdmoore@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Jul 05 1996 - 14:46:06 EDT


Carl W. Conrad wrote:
 
> It struck me that in the initial discussion of Phil 2:6 by Al Kidd there
> was a strange and unnecessary argument about the article TO used with EINAI
> here. It is, I really think, the article used with the infinitive to
> indicate clearly the primary (subject) accusative with which hARPAGMON, as
> a substantive predicate accusative, is equated by hHGHSATO.

        Carl's suggestion on this point is quite plausible. If we accepted the article
in this sense, might it also have an anaphoric function?

-- 
David L. Moore                             Director
Miami, Florida, USA                        Department of Education
dvdmoore@ix.netcom.com                     Southeastern Spanish District
http://www.netcom.com/~dvdmoore            of the Assemblies of God


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:46 EDT