Heb 11:16b revisited....

From: Tom Launder (ae298@lafn.org)
Date: Sat Jan 04 1997 - 02:54:32 EST


Hi and thanks to all who have helped,

I just want to make sure that I understand correctly what I have been
told.

DIO OUK EPAISXUNETAI AUTOUS O QEOS QEOS EPIKALEISQAI AUTWN

dio

 Qeos | epaisxunetai | autous
 o ouk |
              | // epikaleisQai | Qeos
              | | / autwn
              |-----|--

I have understood epikaleisQai to be a complimentary inf and Qeos to a
predicate nominative. I believe that Prof. Winbrey understands the
infinitive as result rather than complimentary.

So did I understand this correctly?

Thanks

Tom



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:01 EDT