From: Tom Launder (ae298@lafn.org)
Date: Sat Jan 04 1997 - 02:54:32 EST
Hi and thanks to all who have helped,
I just want to make sure that I understand correctly what I have been
told.
DIO OUK EPAISXUNETAI AUTOUS O QEOS QEOS EPIKALEISQAI AUTWN
dio
Qeos | epaisxunetai | autous
o ouk |
| // epikaleisQai | Qeos
| | / autwn
|-----|--
I have understood epikaleisQai to be a complimentary inf and Qeos to a
predicate nominative. I believe that Prof. Winbrey understands the
infinitive as result rather than complimentary.
So did I understand this correctly?
Thanks
Tom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:01 EDT