From: Daniel Ria–o (danielrr@mad.servicom.es)
Date: Sat Jan 10 1998 - 14:17:55 EST
>Here's the problem. Where I worship we always make it a point to take the
>Lord's supper on the first day of week after the New Testament pattern. Now a
>good brother, dear friend, and hard working dependable deacon has raised an
>objection. "If this is the "Lord's Supper", then why do we take it in the
>morning. Nobody in their right mind ever had 'supper' in mid-morning! At the
>risk of being irreverent, (which we are not) there's not a thing in the Bible
>about a Lord's brunch!" Here is the question I have for the Greeks. Does
>"DEIPNON" imply time?
*dei=pnon* implica oposici'on con *a)/riston*, que debe preceder al
*dei=pnon*. En 'epoca de J.C. *dei=pnon* es la comida tomada a 'ultima hora
de la tarde, lo que en espanyol llamar'iamos "cena", mientras que el
*a)/riston* ser'ia el almuerzo. Si esto corresponde con alguno de los
t'erminos "DINNER LUNCH and SUPPER" es algo que se me escapa. La oposici'on
entre ambos t'erminos es lo que permanece inalterable en la lengua griega,
ya que en Hom. *a)/riston* es el desayuno y *dei=pnon* el almuerzo.
Daniel.
___________________________________________________________________
Daniel Rian~o Rufilanchas
c. Santa Engracia 52, 7 dcha.
28010-Madrid
Espan~a
e-mail: danielrr@mad.servicom.es
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:51 EDT