From: Jeffrey B. Gibson (jgibson000@mailhost.chi.ameritech.net)
Date: Tue Sep 01 1998 - 15:46:21 EDT
I meant to send this to the list, but ended up sending it only to Phil.
Sorry for the confusion.
Jeffrey
-- Jeffrey B. Gibson 7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A Chicago, Illinois 60626 e-mail jgibson000@ameritech.netMessage-ID: <35EC4D05.2E00@mailhost.chi.ameritech.net> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 12:37:42 -0700 From: "Jeffrey B. Gibson" <jgibson000@mailhost.chi.ameritech.net> Reply-To: jgibson000@mailhost.chi.ameritech.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-AIT (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Phillip J. Long" <plong@gbcol.edu> Subject: Re: EGW EIMI in GJohn (was Present tence copulative verbs) References: <LYR543-5219--lakr@netcom.com> <LYR553-5255--jgibson000@mailhost.chi.ameritech.net> <LYR13683-5257--plong@gbcol.edu> <35ec393f.19104755@mail.gbcol.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Phillip J. Long wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Sep 1998 12:12:02 -0700, you wrote: > > >That is to say, it is an idiom which seems to be > >grounded in Isaiah 63:25, and was used to signify (cf. Mk. 13:6) the > >divine presence and even a claim to divine authority, but says nothing > >about preexistence, let alone continuation over time. For a full > >discussion of this, please see Appendix IV: EGO EIMI __"I AM", pp. > >532-538 in Vol. 1 of Ray Brown's Anchor Commentary on GJohn. > > Help me out here....Isaiah 63:25? Is that the right reference for > this? (I was not following the other thread closely either...) >
Phil,
No, it's not. Brown writes Isa xliii 25. I transposed the xl to an lx. Thanks fort drawing attention to this.
Yours,
Jeffrey
>
-- Jeffrey B. Gibson 7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A Chicago, Illinois 60626 e-mail jgibson000@ameritech.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:02 EDT