From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 22 1999 - 08:57:45 EST
<x-rich>At 11:04 PM -0600 2/21/99, David A Bielby I wrote:
>I've found two separate meanings for Elegkei as I've been studying
John
>16:8 and related occurances of this word in the NT. I've noticed
that
>some translations vary on the meaning that is used in some of the
>occurances in the NT. (NAS using reprove where others use a softer
>word). What's the criteria for leaning one way or the other on this
>word? Is there any help on this from Classical Roots you are aware
of?
Louw & Nida offer, as the only NT usage:
33.417 ELEGCW; ELEGXIS, EWS <underline>f;</underline> ELEGMOS, -OU m:
to state that someone has done wrong, with the implication that there
is adequate proof of such wrongdoing - 'to rebuke, to reproach, rebuke,
reproach
Classical Attic uses the term not only in the above sense, but also of
testing, cross-examining for the purpose of determining whether or not
someone or something is what he/she/it is claimed to be; there is often
an overtone of refutation--a notion that the person or thing being
tested doesn't match what is asserted of it, wherefore ELEGCW can mean
"disprove," "refute," or "show to be false/inauthentic."
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cconrad@yancey.main.nc.us
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
</x-rich>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:17 EDT