
{"id":25875,"date":"2012-05-10T10:39:01","date_gmt":"2012-05-10T14:39:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.carrborocitizen.com\/main\/?p=25875"},"modified":"2012-05-10T10:01:15","modified_gmt":"2012-05-10T14:01:15","slug":"orange-says-no-state-says-yes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/2012\/05\/10\/orange-says-no-state-says-yes\/","title":{"rendered":"Orange says &#8216;no,&#8217; state says &#8216;yes&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By Susan Dickson<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Staff Writer<\/em><br \/>\nDespite a strong showing against Amendment One in Orange County, the constitutional amendment to define marriage as only between one man and one woman was approved by North Carolina voters on Tuesday. <\/p>\n<p>Statewide, 61 percent, or 1,303,994, voted in favor of the amendment, with 39 percent, or 832,283, voting against. <\/p>\n<p>In Orange County, voters came out strongly against the amendment, with nearly 79 percent, or 35,980, voting against, and about 21 percent, or 9,587, voting for. Buncombe, Dare, Watauga, Mecklenburg, Durham, Wake and Chatham counties also voted against the amendment, with the state\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s remaining 92 counties voting for it. <\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We are disappointed in the results,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Aaron Nelson, president and CEO of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We are proud of how Orange County voted and how the urbanized areas of North Carolina voted.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/p>\n<p>Opponents of the amendment argued that the measure could impact domestic-partner benefits offered by businesses and municipalities, and some said they worried that the amendment could drive businesses away or prevent them from coming to North Carolina. <\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153A lot of the proponents said this wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t going to have any impact on the ways of businesses, and we look forward to helping them make good on that commitment,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Nelson said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153It is still the case that North Carolina, and the Triangle in particular, is one of the greatest places to grow and start an enterprise, and maybe that is even underscored by this effort. This great coalition would prove that we have a very progressive business community.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/p>\n<p>Chapel Hill Mayor Mark Kleinschmidt said he was shocked and disappointed by the results, and worried that the amendment could affect Chapel Hill\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s domestic-partner benefits for its employees. Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Orange County all offer domestic-partner benefits for their employees, and the Carrboro Board of Aldermen, Chapel Hill Town Council and Orange County Board of Commissioners all passed resolutions officially opposing the amendment. <\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re really fortunate that we live in a community that gets it,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Kleinschmidt said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153By that I mean that recognizes the value of full equality for everyone and that understands how dangerous this amendment could be to everyone in North Carolina. \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 We are going to have to work hard to \u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 try to mitigate the potential damages this amendment could do and try to protect employees and protect our neighbors and families.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I am concerned about potential challenges that others might bring to our benefits package,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he continued. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We were sued back in the \u00e2\u20ac\u212290s when we began offering domestic-partner benefits, and we won, but that was in a time before there was a constitutional amendment.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d  <\/p>\n<p>Carrboro Board of Aldermen member Lydia Lavelle said she too was concerned about the amendment\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s impacts on Carrboro\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s domestic-partner benefits. <\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Now that the vote\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s actually happened, we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re going to have our attorney take a look at the language of the amendment,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d she said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re certainly going to do everything we can to continue to offer domestic-partner benefits.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s more time, more expenditure of resources, more energy put into something. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s just a shame that we have to do this, but it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s just something that we have to do,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d she added. <\/p>\n<p>Lavelle said she is hopeful that support for the amendment will wane in coming years. <\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153If we had managed to defeat it last night, it would have been in my view a watershed moment for the gay rights movement. I think the vote was much closer than it was five years ago,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d she said, adding that five years from now, it would be even closer. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s just a matter of time.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Despite a strong showing against Amendment One in Orange County, the constitutional amendment to define marriage as only between one man and one woman was approved by North Carolina voters on Tuesday. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25875"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25875\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25876,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25875\/revisions\/25876"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}