
{"id":536,"date":"2007-07-05T06:57:14","date_gmt":"2007-07-05T14:57:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.carrborocitizen.com\/main\/2007\/07\/05\/for-the-record-13\/"},"modified":"2007-07-05T06:57:14","modified_gmt":"2007-07-05T14:57:14","slug":"for-the-record-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/2007\/07\/05\/for-the-record-13\/","title":{"rendered":"For the Record"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Tomorrow, today<\/strong><br \/>\nAs noted previously on our opinion page, this has not been a particularly swell couple of years for efforts to secure a vote on land and water conservation bonds.<\/p>\n<p>Last session, concerns about the level of state indebtedness caused legislators to back away from the bond plan, which would fund a comprehensive effort to save the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153goodliest lands.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<br \/>\nUnless, there is a turnaround \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and, perhaps, an epiphany or two \u00e2\u20ac\u201d the same reasoning will win out this year even though there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a growing state surplus and plenty of lust for bond debt for legislators\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 pet projects.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Make no mistake: The bond debt argument is a straw man for an attempt to undermine conservation in the name of the bulldozer. It is political cover for those afeard of development PACs and it ought to be exposed for what it is.<\/p>\n<p>Land for Tomorrow is not some pie-in-the-sky funding scheme. It has been endorsed by one of the largest, bipartisan coalitions put together, drawing in a wide range of farming, environmental, conservation and economic development constituencies. And it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s part of a long line of progressive and proactive environmental ideas that have become incorporated into this state\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s public policy.<\/p>\n<p>You have to wonder how similar efforts we take for granted would have fared if attempted in today\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s climate. Would our coast be littered with sea walls and riprap and be fenced off for the privacy of the privileged? Would our rivers be perpetually fouled from hog lagoons and our mountains logged and peopled unrestrained?<\/p>\n<p>Somehow, it was all right for the people to vote on the lottery. And it was just fine to put a referendum on the ballot for billions in construction for the university system.<\/p>\n<p>So why not give us a chance to vote on this state\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s future by securing it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s heritage lands and unique habitats for generations to come?<\/p>\n<p>Tomorrow should belong to all of us.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Scooter\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s revenge<\/strong><br \/>\nAlthough much of the country is howling over the commutation of the sentence handed down to Scooter Libby, the decision-maker in D.C. is likely just as indifferent as ever to popular sentiment.<\/p>\n<p>The law-and-order administration has shown that they are only interested in the idea when it applies to other people. Why, just last week the vice president started kicking around the idea that he was an independent branch of the government, neither fish nor fowl \u00e2\u20ac\u201d not in the Executive Branch and not subject to congressional rules either. Then, he, uh, claimed executive privilege when confronted with a subpoena from Congress investigating \u00e2\u20ac\u201d at last \u00e2\u20ac\u201d secret wiretapping of U.S. citizens, something both fishy and foul.<\/p>\n<p>And with the Scooter free, from the defenders of this r\u00c3\u00a9gime comes a familiar chorus. So just in case you happen to run into the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Clinton did it, too\u00e2\u20ac\u009d crowd, you might want ask them if they recall the name of one of the 42nd president\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s more infamous pardons. They may or may not remember it as Marc Rich. Then you might want to ask them if they remember who Rich\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s lawyer was. In case they cannot recall, feel free to remind them. It was Scooter Libby<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tomorrow, today As noted previously on our opinion page, this has not been a particularly swell couple of years for efforts to secure a vote on land and water conservation bonds. Last session, concerns about the level of state indebtedness caused legislators to back away from the bond plan, which would fund a comprehensive effort&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibiblio.org\/carrborocitizen\/main\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}