RE: [compost_tea] Re: Soil microbes and Round Up
 
You hit the nail on the head with the challenges of creating this software,=
 Dan.  With 60,000 species of bacteria you would have a difficult time inpu=
ting the data into the recognition software.  And the software would never =
be perfect, you would still rely on human interpretation of the data.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan <dansquest2005_at_yahoo.com>
Sent: March 17, 2011 9:51 AM
To: compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [compost_tea] Re: Soil microbes and Round Up
 
Hi Tim,
 There are over 60,000 species of bacteria alone and as you know some are v=
ery specific as to being beneficial or detrimental in growing a particular =
plant. I just thought since we already have the technology. The new microsc=
ope that just came out, coupled with a computer software program, it is jus=
t a matter of engineering to have soil analysis that would tell you how hea=
lthy the soil is, what you could grow in it, as is and if you entered what =
you wanted to grow it would spit out the needed inputs. Maybe I am over sim=
plifying but to me this doesn't seem too far fetched. It just seems this is=
 the direction organic farming should be headed and maybe we should put the=
 labs on wheels and do almost instantaneous analysis of the soil, much the =
same way we run medical tests for patients, bring the hospital to the soil =
so to speak.
 Dan in Ct. Where I know I didn't invent the wheel but I did make mine, rou=
nder.
 --- In compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com, "Tim Wilson" <thegoodjob_at_...> wrote:
 >
 > Well I think it is too simple for that. You are only dealing with seven =
groups you need to recognize; bacteria/archea, flagellates, ciliates, naked=
 amoebae, testate amoebae, nematodes, fungal hyphae.
 >
 > These are all identified on my DVD set.
 >
 > Tim
 >
 > --- In compost_tea_at_yahoogroups.com, "Dan" <dansquest2005_at_> wrote:
 > >
 > > Hi Tim,
 > >
[The entire original message is not included]
Received on Thu Mar 17 2011 - 17:17:48 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Feb 07 2012 - 13:58:06 EST